conspiracy theories

[THE SKULLS]

---

unsa man diay nahan nimo iprove diri xavisimao?
unsa nga mga panghitabo?
unsa nahan nimo i-disprove, sulti lang.
basin matubag ta ka gamit kining akong gamay nga alamag.

OK?

[Soul Doctor]

unsa man diay nahan nimo iprove diri xavisimao?
unsa nga mga panghitabo?
unsa nahan nimo i-disprove, sulti lang.
basin matubag ta ka gamit kining akong gamay nga alamag.

OK?

Thank you bai. magmeditate osa ko.
Pawala sa negative energies.
Bilin lang osa ka diha bro.

[THE SKULLS]

i-apil ko Doc, para good vibrations. humana ko meditate.

[THE SKULLS]

Unsay nagpaluyo aning ka-init in between China ug Philippines mahitungod aning Spratly's?

[THE SKULLS]

Ako? Wala ka get over sa Mythbusters?
Toinks!

MYTH BUSTERS!
Have you really watched their series?
They featured MYTHS.

The word myth itself doesn't require thinking, why would one believe in myths?

kamo maoy wala ka get over.

ganahan sad ko'g GhostBusters ba.

OT

[frend]

ganahan sad ko'g GhostBusters ba.

OT

OT: ako nahan xd ko ug BangBusters..

bitaw sa? possible xd na nga gibaligya ang spratlys ky nganu ila mn jd angkonon na layo mn kaau sa ilaha..hmmmmmm

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

Toinkz! Asa nga Hard FACT?
Youre not getting your facts straight.
Hahaha. wala jud tawn kay kalibutan sa ground zero.
No one was allowed to investigate in the ground zero. except Fema who was conveniently stationed in the WTC before, during and after the 911 demolition. They were there to clean the mess. to get rid of the evidence. and then the submit the report which you so eagerly believed as the official report.
All their investigations were all cover ups.

Thats your statement , but in the case of comparison between you and the people that close physically on site , who do you think has more CREDIBLE FINDINGS ? Actual debris being examined or basing the reasoning from pictures sourced out from conspiracy theory sites and youtube ? You tell me Mr. Chemical Engineer .

All you have are allegations and speculations , you never nailed it on the spot , not even once . ALl their INVESTIGATIONS are cover ups ? Lol !

And you are even telling to get my facts straight ? Hahaha ... maybe you forgot about your sensational statement that OBL was not the mastermind of the attacks . Naa pa ka article gani ato di ba ?

No witness was interviewed If there were credible witnesses, they were either murdered or silenced.
and all the evidence were destroyed, recycled and melted and shipped somewhere. and some are warehoused in an FBI facilty where no one is allowed to even look at it. and the rest of the evidence were
planted evidence including the passport of the so-called terrorist that survived the plane explosion and fell to the ground together with all the debris yet it was in perfect condition.
The passport was made of paper if i have to remind you.

Ows ? How the heck did you know about this ? Ahhh .... silly me ! CONSPIRACY THEORIST man diay ka !

So,
if the jet fuel explosion brought down the whole building,
how could a passport, made of paper, survive in perfect condition?
When they (FEMA) could not even find the black boxes which are built to survive any plane crashes.
How could a passport MADE OF PAPER survive the same ordeal?

Debunk that!

Debunk that ? Dili ba na DEBUNK na man na ? Why dont you review the sites and links I gave you . Whats the difference if I literally type the text here or for your to read since you love to research . If you only think of the possibilities sa locations of the supposed mga evidences nimo , does it really take a CHEMICAL ENGINEER to figure out ngano na ugdaw ang puthaw unya ang papel wala ? Pa debunk2 pa ka lol .

Ako? Wala ka get over sa Mythbusters?
Toinks!

MYTH BUSTERS!
Have you really watched their series?
They featured MYTHS.

The word myth itself doesn't require thinking, why would one believe in myths?

kamo maoy wala ka get over.

Lol ... isnt it obvious na wala ka naka get over ? You keep on repeating the same issue about it na dili sila qualified to do such testing hahaha ! And ikaw QUALIFIED ka ?

They FEATURED MYTHS ? How about the word BUSTER ? Do you understand what it is ?

I knew it!
Springfield asked for my achievements and when I gave it to him.
He cry like a baby and said it is irrelevant.

I cry like a baby ? I laugh my azz out actually because you are right , unsay labot gud intawn ana sa 9 - 11 TERRORIST ATTACK that makes you a CREDIBLE INVESTIGATOR .

Dili ba ni hisgut man ko na who would really care sa awards and achievements nimo , ngano man diay ug gamiton na siya against issue , then so be it . The funny part is , wala may kagamitan ang awards nimo against sa issue .

Precisely why I did not want to tell them my achievements because there just a bunch of crabs.
Crabs that pull down fellow Filipinos.

Dili ba na reciprocal ? The moment people presented their piece of argument unya dili nimo madawat kay you are also pulling them down ? It is actually kay ikaw man ang sakto ! Too bad , sayop man ka .

They would not even appreciate the world and its creator.
They only appreciate their achievements
and their own intelligence
and they act like they exclusively own the right to speak in forums like this.
And opinions other than theirs is either false or wrong.

Murag nabali man ang kalibutan na lage noy , are you speaking for yourself ?

@THE SKULLS ....

parehas ra pud na nga pangutana springy kung motu-o ba ko nimo o dili ba.
motu-o ka lang ba ug bisan unsa isulti sa US nimo?
I believe naa kay utok nga mo-investigate.
Bitaw, pasensya na ha nga wa ko anang degree nga inyo gipangkuptan ug gipanghambug. Pero it doesn't take a genius man pud tingali sa mga panghitabo.

Wrong analogy ka . We are talking about CREDIBILITIES here , not what is the TRUTH and not what is FAKE . So i digest pa gyud ug tarong kay lagpas man . Kung mangutana ka nako kung mo tuo ba ka nako or dili , wala ko mahimo ana . Pero ug mo ingon ka , asa man ang katu-uhan , si SPRINGY o si DOK ? kana diha makita ang credibilities as an example . Since daghan man awards si dok , mao na atong gi tuki kay gipahug man niya mas naa siyay alamag sa mga tinuod na experto aning butanga . Gets na nimo ?

Example:

1. naay dako nga eroplano ni dasmag sa pentagon. gitapok ang mga ebidensya. wa man jud sila'y maporma nga dako nga eroplano. akong pagduda, UAV jud to kay ang mga parts nga na-recover, haum ug tukma man sa UAV. d ba? Experts sad nagsulti ana ha, kay kung expert ka, 50-50 sad ako pagtu-o jud.

Mintras puro DUDA ra ang naa nimo , dili na siya mahimong kamatuoran . Unsay gipalabas na man ninyo ni DOK ? Dili ba kamo ang KAMATUORAN o nakahibalo sa unsay tinuod ? Tsur oi .

Olrayts

Balik ta sa topic b, hangyo lang ko, walang personalan para nindot ang diskusyon

Mao na diha karon , kung mo sulti ko na di na tinuod ang sulti ninyo , suko man mo . Kinsay namersonal karon ? Subaya gud tanan diskusyon .

[BeerBreeze]

lingawag basa ani oi... mura naman nig comedy show )

[butong101]

ga sunod gyud ko ani everyday...

[rodsky]

lingawag basa ani oi... mura naman nig comedy show )

It's NOT funny when established science becomes the object of jest and mockery.

-RODION