Are gays and lesbians normal?

[Daiquiri]

---

Of course they are.

[klint1]

normal rana ui kung di pa, nana unta mis mental ron. o.O

[nullpath]

Normal raman guro, naay lagiy mga PURE MALE / FEMALE but they act abnormally man sad

[3nZ0y]

How do you define normal?

[mr_kyme]

they are normal not mutants.

[klint1]

normal - conforming to the usual standard, type or custom.
Microsoft® Encarta® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

[risingstar]

mga normal pud na sila sis oie. Bisan ingon ana na sila, ana na gyud na sila . Para nako ang kanang walay feeling maoy na ang abnormal.

[want2binvolve]

Normal mana clah oie,.. d unta na nato mkaistorya ug tarong ug dili pa... sentido comun...

[klint1]

Ma abnormal rana sila kung wala silay crushes. hihe

[ketllac]

Hmm.. this is just an excuse of same *** intimacy.
Some even look straight, but has desires of sexual intimacy. It is done in secret not in daylight.
Naturalistic View
For a specie to survive according to natural law a male has to display its dominance and power over others. Being a Gay animal is naturally weak therefore is not fit for reproduction and does not contribute to the welfare of a specie to survive since same *** reproduction would not provide an offspring.

In creationist view its very simple God created Male and Female.

Any other reason is just an excuse and not considered normal.

I have a gay friend he very loving and caring person.
I believe they can still be normal.
Like gay people who married and enjoyed a normal life and remain loyal to his wife. I say it is possible.

hehehehe. confused ka sa imo gisulat nga naa kay gay friend nga normal. MOrality imo focus bai dili DIAGNOSTIC.

Part nilayo na ka sa premise. Aside from that I already refuted your argument.

tan-awa ra na imo reasoning oh ''Being a Gay animal is naturally weak therefore is not fit for reproduction and does not contribute to the welfare of a specie to survive since same *** reproduction would not provide an offspring. "

-ni post ka about God pero Darwinism ka nga idea. kana nga reasoning natural selection na part konta na sa imo tinuohan labi na sa creationism. Kabalo ba ka sa imo stand? kana ba gitudlo sa imo simbahan basin nasayop lang ko?

It seems confuse ka sa word morality ug abnormality kay kung tan awon nato morality ang imo pag tan aw sa issue. Kung morality ang imo basehan illogical sad kay dili tanan tawo sa kalibutan pareha nimo ug religion. Ayaw sirad-i imo utok base sa imo tinuohan kay kani nga issue naa belong sa psychological/emotional aspect base sa post sa t/s. Aside from that ang premise naa sa individuality sa pag ka bayot dili same *** marriage.

Asa kuno angulo sa discussion nasakto ka? kay tungod dili sakto base sa imo tinuhuan? Ang relihiyon walay absolute nga katungod mo desisyon ani kung normal o dili kundi naa sa credible nga authority mao ang APA ug psychological community nga in the first place wala gi considera nga abnormal.

Just because considered immoral to some religious sects doenst mean an indicattion of abnormality. Gets?