wala pasad ko kasuway ug ingon ani.. hehehe pero nindot suwayan..hahahaha
wala pasad ko kasuway ug ingon ani.. hehehe pero nindot suwayan..hahahaha
for me i think a friend hu cud give something...
ako nahan jud kaau ko mosuway... pm me lang.. im a guy ha.. hehehe
Friends with benefits is good if walay $exual activity but if naa then mas maayo. hehe
It's not for everyone. Humans are complex beings, sometimes the emotional aspect and the feeling of security is more important than having someone to have s3x with. Sometimes it's the other way around. If you do want to try this type of "relationship", remember:
Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it or because it is written on the internet, but after observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with your reasoning and is conducive to the good and benefit of both parties involved, then accept it and live up to it.
“Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.” - Buddha
naa koy dghan girl friends. pero wla mi benifits.HAHAHA
suya ko ninyo dah.![]()
Then why bother call it "friends with benefits" if walay sexual activity, nga kana man dyud ang meaning sa phrase? Are you guys trying to redefine the term according to local culture/tradition? Calling something "friends with benefits" unya walay *** is like eating fruit salad without fruits.
Some additional comments re FWB being a "fun" activity. Tell me something, when you eat lunch or dinner, do you do it for fun? I bet most of you here would say something like "Oist, ayaw dulaa ang food, gasa raba na gikan ni Lord!" if you saw a kid playing with his or her food. Well let me tell you something, you don't engage in *** for fun (this is how all troubles start in the first place)--you engage in it because like the hunger for food, it's a physiological need. If both parties who engage in FWB both agree on this hunger, and that engaging in FWB means they just both want to satiate the hunger while maintaining their friendship, then there are ZERO issues. Period.
Now just think, if hunger for *** = hunger for food, then now you understand why some people (especially girls, in the Philippines) go on EATING binges, and then get fat, and fatter and fatter--this is redirection of satiation. So, perhaps an alternative method for slimming down? Find an FWB.
Furthermore, I bet most of you here probably think nga this FWB thing is chauvinistic or advantageous to males only. Again, think about it--during the medieval ages until the 1900's, women had almost no right to do what they want--it's always men who were in command. It was only after the 1950's that women had more freedom compared to the olden days. Now, if you take a look closely again at FWB, can you say now that it's a male-thing? Considering the fact that Filipina women now have a choice on who to sleep or NOT to sleep with, and they don't need certain traditional "rules" or "cultural binds" to dictate on how to satiate their need for ***, and furthermore, have the option if they want to carry the FWB relationship to other "levels" (i.e. love, marriage, kids)? Maria Clara didn't have these options, so call yourselves lucky.
This thread alone can tell you a lot about the state of sexual maturity in Filipino society and culture.
-RODION
Last edited by rodsky; 04-22-2011 at 01:24 PM.
mao jud unsay naa sa 4 months?
Similar Threads |
|