True Age of the Universe - Biblical Fact - From Age 0 to Jesus

[endlessknight]

---

Care to explain how the Bible is scientific proof?

[WordofGod]

YouTube - The Bible Confirms Science

[d.a.m.a.s.o.]

...............................

[d.a.m.a.s.o.]

I'm sorry but the Bible isn't scientific proof, dude. And men wrote those words, subject to those men's biases. When King James had the Bible translated, he had committees divide parts of the Bible, which effectively meant that the translation was now subject to the biases of dozens of guys.

I don't have a problem with God, trust me. I just don't agree with what you're saying, that's all.

Don't take the Bible too literally dude. It doesn't have the answer to everything.

And so is Science.

[WordofGod]

yes it's true coz it is just a product of man's limited interpretation whereas the bible teaches us on how to get right with the one who can explain everything about His created universe!

YouTube - Why the Bible? Ravi Zacharias at the University of Illinois

[peterpan1980]

When an Engineer create something, for example a washing machine.
He then makes a usage manual / guide for the people who will be using it.







Now the Creator of All also made a manual for the one who will be using His Creation.

The Holy Scriptures!


When you are saying that there is something "wrong" with the Bible.

You have two things, Its either:

1st - You need to study more.

Or

2nd - God is wrong.

And if you are a believer, those are the only things you have.

If you are not a believer, I respect you and you can go on with your life lying to yourself.

Since the Bible is written by man(limited by his language) but guided by the Holy Spirit.

Man's Science can not explain everything. How much more you want everything to be understood by reading the Holy Scripture.

[peterpan1980]

I actually even believe in when someone say there's something wrong with a specific version of the Bible since there are hundreds of version of it.

But to say their is something wrong with the Bible itself as a whole is wrong.

[pinoy_09]

To TS:

there's no such thing as a "Biblical Fact" --- that's an oxy*****.

[Norad-II]

If you are not a believer, I respect you and you can go on with your life lying to yourself.

You say you "respect" non-believers yet you deride their views by saying that they are "lying to themselves." A bit of doublespeak there, don't you think?

[peterpan1980]

The Carbon Dating Scam



Campaign For Liberty — The Carbon Dating Scam


A few examples of wild dates by radiometric dating:

Shells from living snails were carbon dated as being 27,000 years old.

Living mollusk shells were dated up to 2,300 years old.

A freshly killed seal was carbon dated as having died 1,300 years ago.

“One part of the Vollosovitch mammoth carbon dated at 29,500 years and another part at 44,000.”

“Structure, metamorphism, sedimentary reworking, and other complications have to be considered.
Radiometric dating would not have been feasible if the geologic column had not been erected first.”

Material from layers where dinosaurs are found carbon dated at 34,000 years old.



So if you even try to Carbon Date yourself, you may come up to be hundreds if not thousands years old.

So now the scientist made another presumption: Carbon dating does not work if the thing is less than thousands of thousands years old.

One thing is Clear: "The Selections of Dates that fits what they want. If the date doesn't fit, they bury it."

That's how they do it. They just lie.