conspiracy theories

[THE SKULLS]

---

ingat bai, basin manosebleed ka. hehe.

hahaha, numero kinaon nako Doc. wala lang kaayo ko sa english, pero payts ra ghapon.

ang Luna1 was designed to crash land in the moon, but it missed the moon,

yeah, mao jud ni ila approach diay. mas sad naa sa ako huna-huna. bisan sa ila gipadala sa uban planeta, it would crash first. then mogawas dayon ang rover from the crashed module.

now its in orbit with the Sun between the Earth and Mars.
Mao ni mahitabo sa Lunar Module kung masipyat silag gamay.
Mao nga nakaingon ko nga risky ang pagland softly sa moon using trans lunar injection.
Mas maayo pa nga i-crash landing nimo sa moon kay sigurado pa.

naa ko gipangita Doc, naa to scientist (kadto nag-design sa mga barrell anang tangke de gyera. russian tingali to cya) gi-patay

kay iya concept pagpadala ug rover sa bulan/moon kay pina-agi sa pagpusil jud sa moon. (crash landing tirada)

ako pa gipangita

[tearz777]

this issue is too old.... america deceived the world!

[tearz777]

loslos cardboard...naa diay hangin sa space? tka man lang ka the skulls

[THE SKULLS]

What if, the apollo lunar module did not really land on the moon?

If the only way to get in the surface is crashing. It must be a possible theory.

What if they just orbit around it for days and swing back to earth later and orbit around earth some more.
that's the reason why they have to fake the landing because landing is highly problematic
and they choose not to land.

It's Walt Disney's thing na. No more further explanation.

no one in russia would know if they really land on the moon right?
all they know is the module left earth and on its way to the moon.

hahahaha

[THE SKULLS]

loslos cardboard...naa diay hangin sa space? tka man lang ka the skulls

ask rodsky sir. I'm in favor with 911 deceit.
basa lang, ayaw tira diretso.

[treize]

loslos cardboard...naa diay hangin sa space? tka man lang ka the skulls

Watch this and educate yourself. Asa kag hangin?

YouTube - APOLLO 11: PROOF OF MOON LANDING

Experts all over the world already proved it's authenticity yet you guys are still claiming that it's fake. You are more like declaring that you are highly intellectual than this people are. And I'd say that's arrogance.

Why would the US risk their entire reputation by faking when it's a total humiliation of their entire race if caught? Scientist are hungry for knowledge and discovery, I don't think they would do such a thing.

So are guys saying that man stepping on the moon is impossible then? More like saying iphones are fake, it's impossible to make an iphone.

[THE SKULLS]

So are guys saying that man stepping on the moon is impossible then? More like saying iphones are fake, it's impossible to make an iphone.

what's the connect with moon and iphone? i'm interested.

[miket07]

Mo tuo lng ko aning lunar landing sa US if w/in 10 yrs, this coming 2021 mo balik sila sa moon. Unsa man ilang gidugayan. Is it true naa silay gilikayan sa moon mao wala sila ni adto?

[THE SKULLS]

The computer technology did not exist in the 1960's to build the Apollo guidance computer.

Computer companies of the 1960's had to produce general-purpose computers at a cost that would attract consumers. NASA, on the other hand, required a computer capable of performing only a single task - guidance - and could easily afford a custom designed and built system using cutting edge components and techniques. Although modern microprocessors did not yet exist, microchips performing simple tasks were available in the early 1960's, and these could be built-up into computer processors. By the mid-1960's several companies were producing commercially available integrated circuits.

The hoax advocates often become trapped into a single way of thinking. Just because one technology is used to solve a particular problem today does not mean that problem was unsolvable before the technology was available. Man is much more creative than the hoax advocates are willing to acknowledge.

The astronauts' movement inside the Lunar Module would change the center of mass, throwing the LM off balance, and making it impossible to control.

This is the claim of hoax advocate and Ralph Rene who, apparently, has a poor understanding of physics and the Lunar Module's control systems. The LM had an automatic computer guidance and inertial control system. This system was designed to measure the attitude of the LM several times per second using a system of gyroscopes. If it found that the LM was out of proper attitude it would make adjustments by gimballing the main descent engine and/or throttling it back, and firing control thrusters as needed to stabilize the spacecraft. Despite claims to the contrary, the control thrusters exerted sufficient force to nudge the spacecraft around as necessary to keep it stable.

- wow, grabe ka-advance. "built-up into computer processors." = System-on-a-Chip "SoC"

pastilan. ka-advance oi.

could that be a computer Bios? i dunno. i really dunno.

that would be an SoC if I'm not mistaken

read: The Moon Hoax Debate

[oninrocks]

Mo tuo lng ko aning lunar landing sa US if w/in 10 yrs, this coming 2021 mo balik sila sa moon. Unsa man ilang gidugayan. Is it true naa silay gilikayan sa moon mao wala sila ni adto?

dugay na kaau ang usa wala kabalik sa moon.
nganu kahahmmmm....