conspiracy theories

[Soul Doctor]

---

Back to topic now.

Can anyone say to me that the picture ive shown here is not a controlled demolition.

http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/...s/snowball.jpg

Maybe this will end the debate, i dont know.
But, say something guys!

[Soul Doctor]

CT conpiracy theory doc ako pasabot hahaha dugaya ka check-up nimo oy ...now doc unsa man gyoy imong baroganan aning CT tinood ni or deli.... straight answer lang doc yes or no in ana ra ka simpol akung Q nimo...

about 911?
based on what i saw on tv, pictures and videos.
I think the american public were lied to by their government.
It is as simple as that.

[eternitycontract]

Back to topic now.

Can anyone say to me that the picture ive shown here is not a controlled demolition.

http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/...s/snowball.jpg

Maybe this will end the debate, i dont know.
But, say something guys!

para fair ask neutral people para ani.. hehee kay were both n the same side..

[pinoy_09]

Thomas Eagar, a professor of materials science and engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, also dismissed the controlled-demolition conspiracy theory. Eagar remarked, "These people (in the 9/11 truth movement) use the 'reverse scientific method.' They determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion."

World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Soul Doctor]

Thomas Eagar, a professor of materials science and engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, also dismissed the controlled-demolition conspiracy theory. Eagar remarked, "These people (in the 9/11 truth movement) use the 'reverse scientific method.' They determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion."

World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

yeah, typical courtroom technique.
attacking credibility of one presenting the evidence.
and then generalizing that everything is not worth believing.
lawyer ka bro?

but why dont you just make a comment about the photo on the building i gave you?

I can hear the queen song now on the background.
"Another one bites the dust".
This should be the theme song of the 911.

[Soul Doctor]

From their report:
The American Society of Civil Engineers Structural Engineering Institute issued a statement calling for further discussion of NIST's recommendations,[63] and Britain's Institution of Structural Engineers published a statement in May 2002 welcoming the FEMA report, noting that the report expressed similar views to those held by its group of professionals.[64]


Brod, do you know that part of the conspirators are firemen sent from britain?
They are pretending to be on training in new york, for fire fighting drill they say.

And guess what?
They are the ones with the video cameras on and just below the building.
They got the perfect video of the plane as it crashes to the building.
Is that a coincidence or what?

I think they should be the ones investigated.
It is very convenient for them to turn the camera on at the right time and at the right place.
As if they knew where to point the camera before it happened.
And they're the one sent to go in the tower building?
Maybe to clean up the mess and get rid of the evidence..

As others would say, this Bilderberg group is bigger than any country.
They control the presidents of countries around the world.

[pinoy_09]

yeah, typical courtroom technique.
attacking credibility of one presenting the evidence.
and then generalizing that everything is not worth believing.
lawyer ka bro?

but why dont you just make a comment about the photo on the building i gave you?

I can hear the queen song now on the background.
"Another one bites the dust".
This should be the theme song of the 911.

that was actually my response to your picture, i just didn't bother to quote, but i was hoping you'd get the gist.

i'm not a lawyer and i don't have to be one to use common sense.

and no, those aren't my words. those are from Thomas Eagar, a well-known professor from Massachussetts Institute of Technology. have you ever heard of M.I.T? equivalent ra gud na ug Harvard.

[eternitycontract]

Thomas Eagar, a professor of materials science and engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, also dismissed the controlled-demolition conspiracy theory. Eagar remarked, "These people (in the 9/11 truth movement) use the 'reverse scientific method.' They determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion."

World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

reverse scientific method diay? dli man gud porke naa kay tatak nga professor ikaw ray scientist ug imong science ra ang tinuod ug sakto. everyone is a scientist, kung maguba imong sakyanan or motor imong i check, you are using science. pasabot tanan taw kabaw mu.analyze scientist ta sa iya2 ug adlaw2 nga kinabuha, wala lang ni fit sa iyang standards ang science sa mga theorists (which some are professors too maybe achieved more than thomas eager). kng bot huna2on kana iyang quote para sa mga theorists mas igo cla ana kay cla maoy maau mu reverse sa katinuoran. heee

[orcgod]

the funny thing about the 911 conspiracy is that, Bin Ladin claimed that he was responsible,
and He was at that time in Afghanistan. So lagot si Bush, retaliate siya, so ang gubaton niya si Osama
Bin Ladin unta ug iyang army, uy na-unsang pagka unsaa, ni liku man si Goerge Bush sa Iraq,
Si Saddam man hinuoy gibirahan.

Kana maoy dako kayo nga question mark. Nganu ni likoy man ang US sa Iraq, kung si Osama naa man sa Afghanistan atong panahuna.

[pinoy_09]

reverse scientific method diay? dli man gud porke naa kay tatak nga professor ikaw ray scientist ug imong science ra ang tinuod ug sakto. everyone is a scientist, kung maguba imong sakyanan or motor imong i check, you are using science. pasabot tanan taw kabaw mu.analyze scientist ta sa iya2 ug adlaw2 nga kinabuha, wala lang ni fit sa iyang standards ang science sa mga theorists (which some are professors too maybe achieved more than thomas eager). kng bot huna2on kana iyang quote para sa mga theorists mas igo cla ana kay cla maoy maau mu reverse sa katinuoran. heee

there is a way to approach the scientific method. you gather data and you observe, study that data by analyzing it, and make predictions by way of experimenting.

tanang taw kahibaw mu analyze pero pasabot ba ilang gisunod ang accepted model sa scientific method?