conspiracy theories

[Soul Doctor]

---

hehe ana diay na mag share og idea.. ok.. yes engineer pod ko. chemical engineer pod. kung dili diay engineer dili unta pwede maka share idea?
anyway wa nko gigamit na para maka basehan maka share idea, ako ra gitubag imo pangutana.

if ur a chemical engineer, sa question nimo miagi nganong white man ang smoke and u said its incomplete combustion? aw black smoke ang incomplete combustion doc.

naa na pod ka sa melting the steel..i dont know if gbasa nimo ako previous reply, i said dili matunaw ang steel ato lang na temp, mobawog ra.. u can check in ur perry's chemical handbook sa melting point sa steel. ayaw lang ko wala man koy handbook.

kung complete ang combustion walay smoke makita bro.
i was wrong, it was black smoke shown in those videos.
and it was dust that i mistook as smoke.

still it was incomplete combustion.

can you see a welding torch producing heavy smoke?

[pinoy_09]

well i have to tell you. im a busy man.
i ran 2 businesses and the only convenient thing for me to do is watch instead of read.
so i watch. you read.
but dont believe everything you read.
i would not either.

reading is like eating fish.
take only what is good and spit out what is not good.
take in the truth and spit out the lies.
dont take them all up.
these books are written to make money.

reading is much inaccurate compared to watching.
because you read with your biases.

what is described as a beautiful woman, i could be thinking of my mother and you could be thinking of a supermodel. my point is. its better to watch videos than to read.
at the least we will be seeing the same thing.

you don't have to lecture me on what to read and what not to read.

i've read a tons of journals, articles, and books---and i know which ones are considered reliable and i know which ones are not. that's the main purpose of research... that's the kind of thing you learn in college.

there you go.... you're a busy man, you run two businesses, so you don't have the leisure and time to research on things like this less convince other people that 9/11 is an inside job. please, research first (not just by watching youtube videos) and come back here with a solid argument.

watching videos is better than reading books? i can't agree nor disagree with that... to each his own. some people learn better by watching videos, some people learn better by reading books.

but i know that you can find more reliable source in books. that's why college professors use textbooks, not YOUTUBE videos.

[Soul Doctor]

you don't have to lecture me on what to read and what not to read.

i've read a tons of journals, articles, and books---and i know which ones are considered reliable and i know which ones are not. that's the main purpose of research... that's the kind of thing you learn in college.

there you go.... you're a busy man, you run two businesses, so you don't have the leisure and time to research on things like this less convince other people that 9/11 is an inside job. please, research first (not just by watching youtube videos) and come back here with a solid argument.

watching videos is better than reading books? i can't agree nor disagree with that... to each his own. some people learn better by watching videos, some people learn better by reading books.

but i know that you can find more reliable source in books. that's why college professors use textbooks, not YOUTUBE videos.

ah, youtube, why put it down ?
its the only convenient reference for some one with a computer.

as they say, to see is to believe.
you may say, to read is to believe.

[Soul Doctor]

the fact is. there is no better evidence to base our discussions here but the videos, and testimonies of the survivors.

why would i read?

does csi investigators read to solve those crimes?

does police read to solve a crime?

i dont tell you how to read if you wont tell me
where to get my evidence.

[icon_king]

its getting hot in heat relax lang mo mga bro

[pantaleon]

I only have a few questions for you guys that I'm sure you will enjoy.

1.How many planes crashed into the twin towers in 9-11?

2.What type of airplanes crashed into the twin towers in New York city on September 11th 2001?

3.Is it capable of destroying the Twin Towers?

4.What is the fuel capacity of the Boeing 747 that have hit the Twin Towers?

5.What are the procedures of the Airlane companys to counter terrorism at the time before the attack in 9-11? We all know that aircraft hi-jacking was not rare.

6.Did the Airlane company recieve a distrees call from the pilots of those aircraft? If they have receive it then where is it?

7.Where is the Blueprint of the Twin Towers? Is it strong enough to withstand such impact?

8.What kind of Building materials did they use in building the Twin Towers?


Heres just a few of them,I hope you all can answer it with matching scientific evidence.

[Hammer_and_Sickle]

ah, youtube, why put it down ?
its the only convenient reference for some one with a computer.

as they say, to see is to believe.
you may say, to read is to believe.

ahahahaha, maayuha jud aning soul doctor oy

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

@HIZUKA ...

One last warning na ka anang pagarpar nimo , ako mismo mo BAN nimo . Kutob sa makit-an tika maski asa pa ka na thread , sipyat lang ka gamay .

@SOUL DOCTOR ...

lisod jud ning mods na imong kalalis dah.
wala nay laing forumers motingog.
mahadlok tingale nga initan.

Dont assume too much soul doctor , they probably prefer to just lurk and read . Some probably gikapoy na ug tubay not on you but sa imohang topic .

and why would i change my mind setting?

i have not set my mind on anything yet.

this is why i wanted to discuss it here.

they only thing i set my mind on is finding the truth.

so can we just not say its all been debunked?

can we just discuss this point by point?

Well if that is the case ... my mind is already set on the issue of the 9-11 as a TERRORIST ATTACK . Since you want to make a point na DEMOLITION to , your stand is that it is a CONSPIRACY THEORY that made to look like a terrorist attack . Isnt it obvious ?

Like I said , there is no point of discussing it point by point since you have the tools already . UNless wala niom gi basa ang link na gi provide nako , you will always ask for a discussion . What is the point ? Yes we can say it has been DEBUNKED and not from yesterday but years ago . POINT to POINT of whatever question you can raise from your googling .

if you believed what they are saying in the debunked, then i would not blame you.
most americans believed it too.

I am not believing it . I am convinced nd buying it and not just AMERICANS but on a global scale . That is my claim also as a waiver .

but there are those who would not believe them, that includes me.
if we allow ourselves to think and discuss this event point by point, to the details---
i know in the end we are going to learn something.
again it would not make this exercise a waste of time.

How about this , why would you ask QUESTIONS when you already know the ANSWERS ? Think about it , even if I dont know the answer yet , I am the wrong person to discuss it with because I am not that well verse sa mga issues na gipang bring nimo . Mura bitaw ug ... hey SOUL DOCTOR .... want to talk about FOOD and GUNS POINT by POINT ? But I gave you a tool that carries informational content na dili HAKA HAKA . You should appreciate me , I gave you convenience instead of headache kaysa mag debate na wala tay gi barugan . My sources are from the net but a credible one , whats yours ?

Along he way ... you never READ the sources I gave you because you saif you dont have time to READ but only WATCH VIDEOS . That explains it . Just give it a chance . I know your questions are not your questions , mga questions na gipang kuha ra pod nimo out of the YOUTUBE VIDEOS . na intrigue lang ka but you unkowingly gi DEBUNK na diay that is why I am aksing you to READ .

Reading is better mind you than watching a 2 minute video and makes you speculate tht everything is a LIE .

[neshem]

perrys handbook pa jud. mao nay bible namo.
melting point depende sa type sa steel.

pero ang melting point is just one of the component.
time is the other component.

melting happens if a material is exposed to its melting point at a specific lenght of time.

yes correct doc, melting point depende sa steel.. mao btaw i ask u to look for the melting point of steel.. ang pinakagahi na nga composition gamita.

and one more thing doc.. melting point is a temperature. wala na nag depend sa time.. its a temperature.
"melting happens if a material is exposed to its melting point" .period.

[pantaleon]

Originally Posted by Soul Doctor
melting happens if a material is exposed to its melting point at a specific lenght of time.

and one more thing doc.. melting point is a temperature. wala na nag depend sa time.. its a temperature.
"melting happens if a material is exposed to its melting point" .period.

Wala mo nagkasinabot! Ang bout pasabot ni Soul Doctor kay ang time para ma reach na siya na level sa temperature.

Example:
It take 1 hour to reach 1000 Celsius .