conspiracy theories

[rodsky]

---

lol 9 - 11 CONSPIRACY ..

btw, ^ no double posting pls....

Thanks for the reminder.

-RODION

[Soul Doctor]

Did you bother to check sites that DEBUNKS the 9 - 11 CONSPIRACY THEORY or you only check YOUTUBE VIDEOS ?

Have you done your investigation or you only checked the videos of YOUTUBE and seems to agree with it ebcause it interest you being an avid fan of CONSPIRACY THEORIES ?

Anyways , try to search about the PULL on the WTC 7 and you will know the answer yourself . Mao na ang keyword doc .

yes, off course.

PULL is a demolition term.
Silverstein admitted it on TV but he said he meant to pull out the firemen in the building.
But hey, who is he kidding?

[Soul Doctor]

They don't do it to mislead people per se--their objective to is to hype up a situation so as to profit for it. And this is what I'm against--profiting at the expense of other people who worked hard to do something real and dangerous.

People who have profited from their accusations that the moon landings were faked:

1. Bill Kaysing - Published a book "We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle"

2. Bart Sibrel - made a video called "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" earned tens of thousands of dollars.

3. Ralph Rene - wrote a book "How NASA Mooned America" also earned him big money

and many more. People will do anything to get big bucks and exploit the gullibility of people.

But amateur astronomers like me have the obligation to straighten the facts and make sure that twisted ideas and pseudoscientific claims have no place in a public forum that aims to provide the public with accurate information, esp. on science and technology matters.

===================================




Simulations are designed so that you have the opportunity to practice operating the machine/aircraft before you fly the actual thing. Back in 2002, I was given the opportunity to hand fly a real Cessna 182 private airplane, for the , but the only reason why the pilot allowed me to pilot it was because I already had 10+ years experience flying Microsoft's Flight Simulator series in my home computer. The effect was, I didn't have to exert much effort sa pag palupad, because the physics and avionics was replicated by the simulator.

Similarly, Orbiter space flight simulator uses Newtonian Physics to accurately simulate the movement of interplanetary objects such as spacecraft across interplanetary space--it was designed by physicists and are being used in training by the European Space Agency (so mind you, NOT NASA, so you cannot claim that NASA "tricked" up this simulation) and some other private space firms. It's currently being used as an educational tool to teach young people about rocketry, space exploration and space travel, in different schools around the world.

We can meet anywhere, I already gave my contact number in this thread--just provide me a computer with the specs I requested in my previous post. Or even better, it could be as neshem said, a simulation EB (eyeball), something that we at PFSG (Philippine Flight Simmers Group) do every once and a while. I'll give details of such an event soon.

-RODION

-RODION

Simulation is just like a video game.
It could be used for speculation purposes but--
It is far from the real thing.
how would you simulate the van allen belt radiation anyway
and its effects on the equipments and electronic circuits inside the spacecraft??
how would you simulate its effects on the pilots?

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

yes, off course.

PULL is a demolition term.
Silverstein admitted it on TV but he said he meant to pull out the firemen in the building.
But hey, who is he kidding?

Did you dig more deeper ? Sourced out more articles ? Or only a 1 liner from a statement out of YOUTUBE ?

[rodsky]

Simulation is just like a video game. It could be used for speculation purposes but--It is far from the real thing.

Explain to me how I managed to fly a real airplane without formal training, using only Microsoft Flight Simulator 98, 2000, 2002, and 2004 as my simulation, if it's only "a video game"?

how would you simulate the van allen belt radiation anyway
and its effects on the equipments and electronic circuits inside the spacecraft??
how would you simulate its effects on the pilots?

Simple--they do not factor into the space simulation because the amount of "dangerous" radiation you claim is in fact negligible--the only harmful effect was cataracts in the eyes. Yes, 33 of the 36 Apollo astronauts have developed early stage cataracts that have been shown to be caused by radiation exposure to cosmic rays during their trip. At least 39 former astronauts have developed cataracts; 36 of those were involved in high-radiation missions such as the Apollo missions.

They were only in the belts for four hours, and the astronauts were protected from the ionizing radiation by the aluminium hulls of the spacecraft. Do you know that the the total radiation received on one Apollo trip was about the same as allowed for workers in the nuclear energy field for a year. Meaning kanang mga workers karon sa mga failing nuclear plants in Japan, are receiving MORE radiation than the Apollo astronauts ever did!

Furthermore, if the Van Allen Radiation belts have a lasting effect on the equipment and electronic circuits of spacecraft, explain to me why the following unmanned spacecraft have been successful, without any circuit breakdown, after passing through the belts:

U.S.
1. Pioneer 10 and 11
2. Voyager 1 and 2
3. Galileo
4. Mariner missions
5. Mars Pathfinder
6. Mars Spirit and Opportunity Rovers
7. Messenger
8. Mars Odyssey
9. Phoenix Lander
10. Mars Reconnaissance
11. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
12. Cassini-Huygen's (Saturn Probe)
13. New Horizons (Pluto Probe)
many more...

Japan
1. Kaguya
2. Deep Impact

Soviet
1. All Venera (Venus exploration) space probes
2. Mars 1 and 2
3. All Luna, Lunik and other Russian Moon Landers

Why were all these spacecraft, laden with ultra-sensitive scientific instruments, able to perform and function and carry out mission tasks, if your "radiation" from the VARB are really that "harsh"?

-RODION

[Soul Doctor]

Furthermore, if the Van Allen Radiation belts have a lasting effect on the equipment and electronic circuits of spacecraft, explain to me why the following unmanned spacecraft have been successful, without any circuit breakdown, after passing through the belts:

U.S.
1. Pioneer 10 and 11
2. Voyager 1 and 2
3. Galileo
4. Mariner missions
5. Mars Pathfinder
6. Mars Spirit and Opportunity Rovers
7. Messenger
8. Mars Odyssey
9. Phoenix Lander
10. Mars Reconnaissance
11. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
12. Cassini-Huygen's (Saturn Probe)
13. New Horizons (Pluto Probe)
many more...

Japan
1. Kaguya
2. Deep Impact

Soviet
1. All Venera (Venus exploration) space probes
2. Mars 1 and 2
3. All Luna, Lunik and other Russian Moon Landers

Why were all these spacecraft, laden with ultra-sensitive scientific instruments, able to perform and function and carry out mission tasks, if your "radiation" from the VARB are really that "harsh"?

-RODION

it easy too.

they turn off equipments as they approach the belt and turn it on later when they pass the belt.

but its another story if humans passes through that belt.

[rodsky]

it easy too.

they turn off equipments as they approach the belt and turn it on later when they pass the belt.

but its another story if humans passes through that belt.

Mamili man kag unsay tubagon nimo Doc Wala nimo gitubag akong question:

Explain to me how I managed to fly a real airplane without formal training, using only Microsoft Flight Simulator 98, 2000, 2002, and 2004 as my simulation, if it's only "a video game"?

they turn off equipments as they approach the belt and turn it on later when they pass the belt.

Turn them off? And lose navigation/bearing data in the process, thereby throwing the spacecraft off course?

ADDENDUM: Another great example that simulation "...puts you there."
iRacing.com | Greger Huttu’s (Nearly) Perfect Adventure
Geek, rebooted - BBC Top Gear

-RODION

[Soul Doctor]

Did you dig more deeper ? Sourced out more articles ? Or only a 1 liner from a statement out of YOUTUBE ?

well, let just say that if a picture speaks a thousand words.
a video speaks a million.

i believe in videos, as long as it was raw and not doctored or unedited (with special effects, etc)
more than words.
youtube or not.
do not underestimate the information and power of youtube.
we produced a lot of talents through it.

enough with articles written by whoever.

lets just answer simple questions with simple answers.

when do you see a fire with white smoke all around?

if there was a real fire with intense heat enough to melt a concrete cement covered (aside from the asbestos foamed covering the) steel frames. what would be the color of the smoke?
what is the color of the smoke in the 911 wtc building?

the presence of white smoke indicates that combustion is incomplete,
or not enough oxygen to burn all molecules of whatever is combustible element or compound present in the building.
that alone is proof that there was no intense fire and heat

in fact in the video of the building collapsing, all you see are white smoke of dust.

and if the plane is the source of the fuel that burns and melt the steel frames,
how did it reached the ground floor and melt the frames there too?

because in the ground floor of the building are part of the steel frames that are cut and not bent or melted.
they were cut demolition style using what is possibly thermite.

[Soul Doctor]

Mamili man kag unsay tubagon nimo Doc Wala nimo gitubag akong question:

Explain to me how I managed to fly a real airplane without formal training, using only Microsoft Flight Simulator 98, 2000, 2002, and 2004 as my simulation, if it's only "a video game"?






Turn them off? And lose navigation/bearing data in the process, thereby throwing the spacecraft off course?

ADDENDUM: Another great example that simulation "...puts you there."
iRacing.com | Greger Huttu’s (Nearly) Perfect Adventure
Geek, rebooted - BBC Top Gear

-RODION

so if i played a simulation of going to the moon perfectly it means i could go to the moon already?

[Soul Doctor]

Mamili man kag unsay tubagon nimo Doc Wala nimo gitubag akong question:

Explain to me how I managed to fly a real airplane without formal training, using only Microsoft Flight Simulator 98, 2000, 2002, and 2004 as my simulation, if it's only "a video game"?






Turn them off? And lose navigation/bearing data in the process, thereby throwing the spacecraft off course?

ADDENDUM: Another great example that simulation "...puts you there."
iRacing.com | Greger Huttu’s (Nearly) Perfect Adventure
Geek, rebooted - BBC Top Gear

-RODION

nasa said thats how they would do it.