Wikipedia ka tuho an bah 100% or dli

[JeKeRo]

---

It is not really 100%, but I think its accuracy would reach up to its half or more. Pero ang uban gurO dLi sad sakto. Pero daghan mn sad mga researchers or net surfers nga mogamit og wiki as reference. (Even me ) labi na sa mga SPECIFIC nga mga botang (i.e. NAMES,THINGS, etc)

[peewee_toot]

this can be edited. so not 100% true...

[ayki]

nope. always find a primary source especially if you're doing research.
it's a good place to START, but it's not a smart idea to solely base your research on it.

[bahbie_cakes]

mostly for me katuho-an mn pero naa times na dile siya as detailed..

[Chedot]

nope. always find a primary source especially if you're doing research.
it's a good place to START, but it's not a smart idea to solely base your research on it.

I agree with ayki. Based on what I experienced, wikipedia can be edited and be filled with hoax statements.

[jonnyjoe]

naay uban na sakto.uban dli

[jcs]

ambot lang kaha nasayup na sila, wala paman na news naay sila sayup...

[nealotol]

bitaw.. pwede jud...

[iamshangkee]

i don't think so, ang wikipedia kay more on solicited ideas by random people man gud, but i think that some articles are factual, the rest murag opinions na.

Pwo if ur going to use the site para sa mga assignments sa school, i think mas ok if mag dwell pa mo on other trusted sites.

[marqi_20]

accurate only on search like assignment ang wikipedia pero sa uban nga article kay pwde man gud ma change sometimes accurate sometimes not