US OPEN Tennis 2006 - AUG 28 - SEPT 10

[level42]

---

Di ko makasulti nga si Nadal is best on Clay.... Bjorn Borg got 6 French Open titles... unya naa pa si Kuerten, Bruguera, ug Muster.

Then si Roger, di sab ta makasulti nga he's just another Pete Sampras kay Roger has a more well-rounded game compared kang Pete.... and he's got the skills to win the French unlike Pete. Dako gyud kaayog potential si Roger uy.. 9 na ka majors and he's only 25 (Borg got 11 when he retired at 26).

bai opinion ra na nako nga the best si nadal sa clay, not necessarily tinood gyud na. im just basing sa iya record 60 winning streak og 2 straight french open titles at a very young age, plus kaduha niya gipalukapa sa clay ang the best of the best karon (federer).

and regarding federer dako kaayo siyag potential nga ma the greatest, pero wala pa gyud niya na prove nga ni dominate gyud siya sa clay, dili parehas sa hardcourt og grass nga 100 percent sure kaayo siya pirmi.

[EZRA]

Mao sab ako-ang opinion (lol, wala ko mo lalis nimo) ... di "ko" makasulti nga si Nadal maoy best ever sa clay...

[caloyski]

Nadal beat Fed on the hardcourts TWICE... while FED only beat RAFA once on the hardcourts.

Head-to-Head matchup.... 6 win RAFA (twice on hard, 4 times on Grass) - 2 wins Roger (once on grass, and once on the hard courts)

dli ba 4 times on clay, dili grass? murag wala pa man kadaog c nadal against federer sa grass

[EZRA]

Hard diay..... sayop*