The Luciferian Doctrine

[malic_2]

---

mura man kag si punseo pilato manghunaw dayon.. hehe

bitaw dili ikaw kahibaw ko ana pila pagud idad nimo compare sa mga scholars..

so mangutana ko unsa nga petsa ang gi ingon sa mga scholars? nga nakahibaw man ka nga mas karaan jud na ang other side of the story ni lucifer?

ayaw ipasa ang sipyat nako kay wa gyud mahogaw akong kamot. imong pangutana maoy tarunga.

kanang style nimo nga mag drop drop dayun og name "punseo pilato" kinaraan na kaayo na bai,try harder or should i say try something new. hahahahaha...

basaha lang to ang akong previous post, katong post #61. kay kapoy og balik balik.


tagaan tika og mga clues ha...para masabtan pod nimo ba.

the word Lucifer written in the bible is not even a Hebrew word, onsa man ang language nga gigamit sa old Testament? di ba hebrew man to? Si Jerome nga ga translate sa bible into Latin maoy nigamit ana nga name.

[_hizuka_]

karon pa ko kabalo ani ba, dugay na jud diay ko walay simba2x nayahaahahah...

[Vien]

Y man nga gi promote sa simbahan ang teaching about kang Lucifer nga maayo kuno na nga being? as what we mostly knew, he was the adversary of the Lord Jesus Christ. Y man nibali na karon ug hinay2 ang simbahan nga Katoliko?

duda ko ani dah, heheheh.

bro proof bro before we totally believe. show us your proof.

[treize]

Was I brutal? I was just being honest.

Is it being honest? Or you are just trying to humiliate another poster? And for what purpose? Is it that bad not to post the link?

Yeah that's brutal and way out of topic since you did not disagree nor agree with what was posted.

Yet that's a lesson for nailv. If you are going to copy something from another site, just copy exact content and don't pretend to make it yours by editing it or face the consequence of humiliation.. And also don't forget to post the link.

Peace...

[THE SKULLS]

I better listen to "Imagine"

[Crimson_Viper]

this is madness .. hehe

this is SPARTAAAAAAAAAA.!

[sHenZee03]

Is it being honest? Or you are just trying to humiliate another poster? And for what purpose? Is it that bad not to post the link?

Yeah that's brutal and way out of topic since you did not disagree nor agree with what was posted.

Yet that's a lesson for nailv. If you are going to copy something from another site, just copy exact content and don't pretend to make it yours by editing it or face the consequence of humiliation.. And also don't forget to post the link.

Peace...

OT: Being honest is different from humiliating another person but it can be an effect of what truth was divulged during the process. For what purpose? My sole purpose was to inform other readers of his post that he did not come up with his ideas alone or rather, it was not his idea or thoughts to begin with. I aimed to prevent people from being misled into believing such deceitful means of conveying his thoughts considering the fact that this thread talks about certain "truths". And what's so wrong about not posting the source? I have cited one thing in my reply to his post - PLAGIARISM. IF ever the author of that site would stumble upon his post, he would be very upset for sure because I for one would be, too.

Wouldn't you want to be given credit for something you worked hard for? Well, I don't know about you but I certainly do and I know the author would've agreed with me too. And how would you feel if all the replies here were just copied and pasted just like his? Wouldn't you feel betrayed and deceived? I would.

Yes, I was off topic and I apologize for my negligence. I hope this gives you the answers to your questions. Thank you for citing my mistake. Really appreciate it. ^_~

OnTopic: I think what the Church is trying to tell the people is that no one is born evil, not even Lucifer. But of course, it's just how I view it.

[treize]

OT: Being honest is different from humiliating another person but it can be an effect of what truth was divulged during the process. For what purpose? My sole purpose was to inform other readers of his post that he did not come up with his ideas alone or rather, it was not his idea or thoughts to begin with. I aimed to prevent people from being misled into believing such deceitful means of conveying his thoughts considering the fact that this thread talks about certain "truths". And what's so wrong about not posting the source? I have cited one thing in my reply to his post - PLAGIARISM. IF ever the author of that site would stumble upon his post, he would be very upset for sure because I for one would be, too.

Wouldn't you want to be given credit for something you worked hard for? Well, I don't know about you but I certainly do and I know the author would've agreed with me too. And how would you feel if all the replies here were just copied and pasted just like his? Wouldn't you feel betrayed and deceived? I would.

Yes, I was off topic and I apologize for my negligence. I hope this gives you the answers to your questions. Thank you for citing my mistake. Really appreciate it. ^_~

OnTopic: I think what the Church is trying to tell the people is that no one is born evil, not even Lucifer. But of course, it's just how I view it.

I'm sorry but that's how I see it, although I loved it when you nailed it..


Anyway if you guys have some free time, try to visit these links.. and give it some time to read..

MasonicWorld.com

The Confession of Léo Taxil

It'll be a nice read...

[bakahame]

better stop nalang ni. if you want to in to the darkside you can always find what your looking for my friends not here.

[Scott Bernard]

Lucifer was not born or created evil.... everything God created is good (so as they say)... but we have the choice to decide if we become evil or not...

Actually, the name Lucifer is the name when he was still an angel, loved by God at His side and looked after the fellow angels because of his character...

When he fell and was stripped of his heavenly prowess, Lucifer's name was changed to Satan.... Satan is the Evil name, not Lucifer.

But it's just a name... Satan was Lucifer... so some might impose that Lucifer is the Devil's name...