Police Harrasment??

[keyran]

---

Dili... Table Tennis Player ko sa YMCA(T_T)

kinsa diay ka.? kaila ko nimo.?

[keyran]

Dili... Table Tennis Player ko sa YMCA(T_T)

ot

BISAG ganahan ka mopalit ug coins slot machine pre asemble box..

or piso piso nga nga computer naa ko...

[penigabz]

ot

BISAG ganahan ka mopalit ug coins slot machine pre asemble box..

or piso piso nga nga computer naa ko...

Ayaw diri kay dili ni buy and sell section. Ma infraction ta, anyways... check your inbox. naa ko gi PM nimo

[cool_guy]

mao cguro suko kaayo ang pulis kay hinulaman cguro to nya ang pajero. peace mr. pulis

[keyran]

mao cguro suko kaayo ang pulis kay hinulaman cguro to nya ang pajero. peace mr. pulis

mao siguro bai..

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

sorry ha ,,pero dili ko mo agree sa imong statement.. ang title it self does not judging anything nor pointing to all police force. What the real score is the ts want to know prior to his statement kung harrastment ba ang gibuhat sa person that assuming nga police, nga in the long run .pulis gyud diay..

If it is not pointing at all the police force , then the title should be stated as " POLICE OFFICER HARASSMENT ?" instead of Police Harrasment?? , can you see the big difference now ?

Now when you say the REAL SCORE , that is UNASSUMING because the score was only established pag atubang nila , dili during the CONFRONTATION . Can you see again the big difference now ?

Now kay na established man ang fact na PULIS jud diay , siya ra ang NANG HARASS and dili ang PNP which mao na ang description when you generalized using the term POLICE kay di man specific and my dear , that is very UNFAIR to the rest of the POLICEMEN and WOMEN who are doing their jobs extraordinarily well .

wala na siya maka mis lead sa akoa kay " ITS A TITLE WITH QUESTION MARK" it means for me , wala na siya mag judge.. it is a pangutana that need an answer to our fellow istoryan...

Maski unsang klasehang mark pa na ang ibutang , it is not about the question but the word/s used .

Though the issue here is irrelevant since it is about the TRAFFIiC INCIDENT and the HARASSMENT , I just hope ma solve ni siya asap , give where just is due .

[RMK711]

^ Why don't people just read the first post? The subject heading is not meant to anticipate all the possible interpretations of potential readers, if it says police it could mean a single police officer, a group of them or the entire organization, but if you read the first post it's pretty clear the TS is referring to a specific individual. Common sense would dictate that if a word is used generally like that it is obviously not referring to everyone in the organization.

[keyran]

If it is not pointing at all the police force , then the title should be stated as " POLICE OFFICER HARASSMENT ?" instead of Police Harrasment?? , can you see the big difference now ?

Now when you say the REAL SCORE , that is UNASSUMING because the score was only established pag atubang nila , dili during the CONFRONTATION . Can you see again the big difference now ?

Now kay na established man ang fact na PULIS jud diay , siya ra ang NANG HARASS and dili ang PNP which mao na ang description when you generalized using the term POLICE kay di man specific and my dear , that is very UNFAIR to the rest of the POLICEMEN and WOMEN who are doing their jobs extraordinarily well .



Maski unsang klasehang mark pa na ang ibutang , it is not about the question but the word/s used .

Though the issue here is irrelevant since it is about the TRAFFIiC INCIDENT and the HARASSMENT , I just hope ma solve ni siya asap , give where just is due .

sorry dili ko konbensido sa imong explaination..maybe the reason is that..lahi lahi ta sabot , imo sad na nga sabot and i respect what your opinion is..but for me in my own opinion..wala na maka mislead sa akoa, and i hope you do respect that also..hehehehe..

[keyran]

^ Why don't people just read the first post? The subject heading is not meant to anticipate all the possible interpretations of potential readers, if it says police it could mean a single police officer, a group of them or the entire organization, but if you read the first post it's pretty clear the TS is referring to a specific individual. Common sense would dictate that if a word is used generally like that it is obviously not referring to everyone in the organization.

right i totally agree with you bro. we both have the same opinion.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

^ Why don't people just read the first post? The subject heading is not meant to anticipate all the possible interpretations of potential readers, if it says police it could mean a single police officer, a group of them or the entire organization, but if you read the first post it's pretty clear the TS is referring to a specific individual. Common sense would dictate that if a word is used generally like that it is obviously not referring to everyone in the organization.

That is right if you read the first post but what makes you read the first post ?

The moment you see the title right ? YOu dont just randomly click threads and read first post , you go to that thread because you want find out what is going on with the TITLE .

And I didnt say it is a MISLEADING FIRST POST , I stated it is a MISLEADING TITLE . It is not a commonsense dicating because most of the time , if a GENERALIZED word is used , we all would end up in SPECULATING . The thing is , I could care less on all this scenarios , maski ga patay pa to sila sa village nila just because of a dent or a scratch but what I am lifting up , pointing out and emphasizing here is the GENERALIZATION . It is unfair to to those who are in the force . Su sama sa gi awhag atong isa ka poster na igsoon cguro , kang kinsa man sila ni tawag nangayo ug advise ? Dili ba sa POLICE OFFICER ra pod gihapon ? Unsay paminaw kaha ato niya ug maka dungog siya ug " POLICE HARASSMENT " ?

Now , to end this discussion since OT man ta ... kung naka tag-an mo dayon na di to siya MISLEADING then so be it .