
Originally Posted by
observer
Who can forget Chris Go's exploits in astronomy, Red Junior? I checked out the price tag for the Celestron C8 in Amazon, and guess what? It costs US$1,529.00! The C14 would set you back a hefty US$ 5,299.95 for the optical tube alone. Anyone serious in astro-photography must have relatively large disposable savings. You can tell these people are serious astro-photographers from the equatorial mounts. For the novice, this would take time to set up and align (which involves finding the star Polaris). This is because, in astro-photography, your telescope must follow the rotation of the earth along its polar axis when setting the camera for extended exposure. But nowadays, scopes come with computerized go-to features, which takes away all the hassles of finding stars...but again for $$$. They don't call astro-photography a "rich man's hobby" for nothing.
Having lots of money = lots of top astrophotography equipment = best astrophotos < This is really wrong. Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. Processing those photos, deciding how many exposures composites to stack, choosing the right right stacking method, noise removal, etc... These require A LOT of experience and patience. It's not as easy as it may seem.
Aligning with the Earth's axis is just one of the initial steps. But not the most difficult one. The reason why I never really went into serious Astrophotography was because of all the image processing I would have to learn to obtain top notch photos even though I have a good background in scientific image processing. Eitherway, astrophotography in some way requires money but it requires more knowledge, skill and patience.