endangered species pwede. but not extinct species like dinosaurs.
even identical (monozygotic) twins who grow up together in similar environment do not think alike, much less a clone and the original. capacity for thinking is genetic and thus can be cloned but specific ways of thinking are acquired and therefore can't be biologically copied. lamarck was wrong with his idea of inheritance of acquired characteristics.
kung sa mga animals pwede kaau ma balik ang mga dugay na kaau na extinct na mga animals.
If cloning is strictly limited to individual human organs, then for me it's OK (life saver).
But if the cloning goes to the next level which is to clone an entire Human embryo....then that's a is big NO....
But then again reality bites / truth hurts....the progress in science will never be stopped, it can be slowed down but eventually it will surpass any obstacle in this physical and material world of ours.

makahuna2x ko sa avatar na movie...kung akong e clone akong self then ipa mature na xah..if maabot ang time na hapit nako ma dead..gusto nko e transfer akong thoughts sa clone naku which is youger
AWESOME THREAD..... mau untag masuccessful ang human cloning....
Not into human cloning.. it will result an imbalance of nature. Cloning for the purpose of harvesting human organs? It's inhumane.. considering you are cloning a "human". There are some other ways.. i guess by unlocking the mystery of our DNA.
Similar Threads |
|