MERGED: Vigilantism and related issues

[tolstoi]

hmmm..modz where art though

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

Because you have alleged that the story is not reliable due to media collaboration. If you make an idiotic, baseless accusation, it is your responsibility to prove it. or didn't they teach you how to think at home?

And you are suggesting that my claim of media collaborating each other justifies FAKING STORIES ? You said that and I did not . Just because they collaborate automatically makes it FAKE ? They can collaborate and yet still make stories that are legit and verifyable but in some cases they TWIST and SENSATIONALIZED ... where is FAKING in that ?

Because under the law, he is INNOCENT until proven guilty. There is NO NEED TO PROVE INNOCENCE. Can't you even grasp that most basic rule of law and democracy? Good grief, how dumb can someone be?

Ows ? Even though someone already commited crime and was identified ? Yes they could be INNOCENT UNTILL PROVEN GUILTY on the accounts of their crime but it does not make them innocent people either because by commiting a crime it makes you a CRIMINAL already .

The case was all about Raganas. You were just trying to change the subject because you were trapped like a smelly rat.

You brought up the issue of Mr Raganas , I didnt . Dont drag me into your stinky hole again because I smell a trap that will regulate me for being PRO VIGILANTE . Since when was the RAGANAS TOPIC the subject of the discussion ? Since when ? The day you almost ran out of EXCUSES and ALIBIS ?

But you are NOT talking INTELLIGENTLY. You keep repeating the same KNUCKLE-DRAGGING MISTAKES, and several of us have pointed it out to you repeatedly!. Still, you can't seem to get simple logic to stick in that vacuous area between your ears. It must echo a lot in there.

Look who is talking . WHo keeps on repeating ? Me or you ? Mr Manny .... you are so unchristian now of your lies and deceptions .

Again .... what are your REALISTIC SUGGESTIONS to MINIMIZE CRIME so the CRIMINALS will lessen and the exisrence of Vigilantes ( if ever they existed ) will be be history . I am waiting Mr Manny Boy .... and please dont get mad . Dental floss lang ang kinakabitan ng puso tatang . It will help staying on course of the topic . I am talking about SPECULATIONS regarding VIGILANTES , how the MEDIA is TWISTING and SENSATIONALIZING the ISSUES and you on the otherhand are all AD HOMINEM .

[mannyamador]

And you are suggesting that my claim of media collaborating each other justifies FAKING STORIES?

Faking stories is not justified. It's wrong. But YOU are saying that the stories are not credible because of alleged collaboration. So if the stories are not faked, then why are they not credible? You just contradicted yourself again.

TWIST and SENSATIONALIZED ... where is FAKING in that ?

Twisting stories is not faking them? Then why are they not credible to you? What kind of logic is that?

Even though someone already commited crime and was identified?

Identified by whom? Where is the proof of that? ZERO! As usual.

Since when was the RAGANAS TOPIC the subject of the discussion ?

When YOU questioned the credibility of the story.

When you learn how to think in a rational manner, maybe you can go forward. Until then, you just keep sticking your foot in your mouth.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

Faking stories is not justified. It's wrong. But YOU are saying that the stories are not credible because of alleged collaboration. So if the stories are not faked, then why are they not credible? You just contradicted yourself again.

Who said about FAKING STORIES ? Quote me please so it will be justified . I dont know if you understood yourself on what you are blabbering about because I didnt . COllaboration on what to report and some reports are not credible because of the source of the reports that are not credible also ... I dont see any FAKING ISSUES in there . Just because they COLLABORATE they are up to FAKING ? LOLZ !!

Twisting stories is not faking them? Then why are they not credible to you? What kind of logic is that?

Just because it is twisted it is FAKING again ? Its you who needs to prove that because the word FAKING came from you and not from me . Here we go again ... MISLEADING and CONFUSING the readers by dragging me to your hole . CREDIBILITY lies in the individuals approach of the issue . I find them busy on sensationalizing and twisting reports . How is that related to all the accusations you just threw to me ?

Identified by whom? Where is the proof of that? ZERO! As usual.

LOLZ .... for once please push the button that says : " COMMONSENSE "

When YOU questioned the credibility of the story.

I questioned it ? Are you sure ? DOnt make up stories now because it is slowly becoming a reason that you are just trying to excuse yourself . I am putting the issue of Mr Raganas as an example to the scenario on how YOU , Mr MANNY BOY you justify everything but you have nothing and never had a thing because you based everything on what you read from your suking balita .

When you learn how to think in a rational manner, maybe you can go forward. Until then, you just keep sticking your foot in your mouth.

LOLZ ... thats all you got ? napakasakit TATAY MANNY .... wheres my request of your suggestion of a better and crime free / lesser crime rate CEBU ? Still thinking of a better excuse ? Oh well .. I am just here waiting for you ...muah !!

[mannyamador]

Who said about FAKING STORIES?

So if the story was not faked, then you must admit that the story is credible. Is it or not?

Just because it is twisted it is FAKING again?

Well, if a story is twisted, then it is not wholly true, or some part of it is not true. Or else why would you say it is not credible. Playing with words can't hide the facvt that you simply don't have an argument.

Try some common sense. You talk a lot about it, but apparently have NONE of it.

[naz]

instead of arguing, why don't you guys give a realistic solution to lessen crime rate..
i meant a solution that can be applied immediately..

springfield says vigilante is the solution to lessen crime rate.. (correct me if i'm wrong)
what do you suggest mannyamador?

[wak_wak]

springfield says vigilante is the solution to lessen crime rate.. (correct me if i'm wrong)
what do you suggest mannyamador?

maminaw mi

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

So if the story was not faked, then you must admit that the story is credible. Is it or not?

Just because a story is not faked means it is also CREDIBLE ? Yes the story is credible regarding the reportd of his ( mr Raganas ) untimely death and his job as a " lapida maker " but the media was not specific of any issues towards angles that needs to be looked at and instead pushed the VIGILANTE ISSUE right away . Remember the fine line between VIGILANTE STYLE and VIGILANTE HIT ? Dont limit me with s YES or NO answer ... you know better than that Mr MANNY BOY .

Well, if a story is twisted, then it is not wholly true, or some part of it is not true. Or else why would you say it is not credible. Playing with words can't hide the facvt that you simply don't have an argument.

The fact is I asked you to ask your MEDIA FRIENDS what I was talking about . You said you did .... yeah right .

Try some common sense. You talk a lot about it, but apparently have NONE of it.

Oh please you are really going nowhere . BTW .... thanks for taking my advice of being more of an " EASY TIGER " .

@ NAZ .... I never said VIGILANTE is the solution of a lower crime rate but it will trigger a sign of people thinking twice of commiting a crime . I was also referring to NON VIOLENT OPTIONS but so far nothing was given yet.

[mannyamador]

Just because a story is not faked means it is also CREDIBLE?

The articler was accurate in ALL respects, even with the vigilante angfle. Show me how the article was inaccurate. Your claims have ZERO suppiorting evidence.

The fact is I asked you to ask your MEDIA FRIENDS what I was talking about . You said you did .... yeah right .

Shooting your mouth off again? I challenge you to prove otherwise. Or is all you've got just a lot of HOT AIR again?

I never said VIGILANTE is the solution of a lower crime rate but it will trigger a sign of people thinking twice of commiting a crime.

There are many WRONG ways to achieve the same end. Vigilanteism is one of them. To even consider vigilanteism as a viable option is just plain dumb.

[kiwiboy]

lisud jud au mka judge kay nag ka iya jud tag opinion aning mga butanga....
sa katong mga biktima na ug mga kawatan, snatchers ug holdapers...
mag pasalamat na sila ani...
apan sa mga wala pa ma biktima...
mag kondena jud sila....
lisud jud kaau kun divided ang opinon natu...