
Originally Posted by
SPRINGFIELD_XD_40
I dont need to prove anything because you know about it already;
Yes you do. You made an allegation.
But you have NOT given any evidence to back it up. You are engaging in a logical error. If you do not give proof, then your claims shopuld be considered as invalid, speculative, and not worhty of co0nsideration. And you should be considered as arrogant, irrational, or even stupid, depending on the case.
Collecting available stories of the MEDIA are comparable how I collected mine . The fine line though is , those PEOPLE who knows me knows how credible I am and not just from someone who you interact in the net or to those people whom the media gathered their stories .
Wrong again. Your
CONSISTENT inability to back up yo0ur contentious claims shows you are NOT credible. The media satories I quoted were at least able to give
verifiable evidence.
It is a clear print of example that we all know how the MEDIA did the reporting . I am giving it as an example also for you .
Where's the evidence i asked for? All you've given me is your stupid speculation,
WITHOUT any evidence. Stop beinga coward. You made the allegation of media collaboration to falsify the story. It's time for you to prove it or admit you were being an
irresponsible loudmouth in making such a baseless accusation.