View Poll Results: Gusto ba ka ibalik ang mga vigilante? YES or NO

Voters
182. You may not vote on this poll
  • YES

    134 73.63%
  • NO

    48 26.37%
Page 70 of 291 FirstFirst ... 606768697071727380 ... LastLast
Results 691 to 700 of 2903
  1. #691

    Default Re: DEATH SQUAD strikes back!

    ok pud kaayo nanag CDS(Cebu Death Squad)...
    dili man gani sila maluoy sa ilang gitulis or gi-snatch or gikawatan..dapat hutdon pud na sila... payts..

  2. #692

    Default Re: DEATH SQUAD strikes back!

    As long as there is no CHRONIC CRIMINAL , there will be no VIGILANTE .
    " A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America

  3. #693

    Default Re: DEATH SQUAD strikes back!

    Quote Originally Posted by SPRINGFIELD_XD_40
    Why ? It could be a stepping stone to a bigger picture for future purposes . Look at the crime rate of Cebu now .
    So you ARE implying vigilanteism is a good thing then! And here's where my point comes in. If you can't even identify that the vigilantes are the ones engaging in the acts, then how can you even claim that any good comes from them?

    Tell me now, what part of that simple logical process can't you comprehend?!!!

    By the way, YOU said vigilanteism is an option for the jsutice system, whether vigilanteism is good or bad. And I precisely pointed out that you were wrong because something bad should not be an option for a justice system. It has to be somethign good to be a viable option for a justice system (you do know what justice means, right?). So it is incumbent on you to prove that vigilantiesim is good. But seeing how you can't even seem to grasp the most basic logical concepts, I doubt you weill ever come up with anything. If only you would try to THINK instead of trying to get personal and shooting your mouth off... but perhaps I'm expecting too much from you. Oh well...

    Only the ANTI VIGILANTES says the VIGILANTE SYSTEM is bad . So dont generalize it Mr Manny Amador otherwise you will be barking at the wrong tree again.
    Uh, in case you haven't figured it out yet, that's why they are ANTI-vigilante: because they think it's bad. Conversely, the pro-vigilantes think vigilanteism is good. Now do you really think belaboring the obvious makes you look more intelligent? Good grief!

    Yes .. I know also that this statement of yours is very elementary in nature considering your age
    Considering you can't even comprehend it, that says even more about your mental maturity!

    As long as there is no CHRONIC CRIMINAL , there will be no VIGILANTE .
    As long as there are *****s who think vigilantes are good, the EXCUSES for killing remain, and the killing will naturally continue!

  4. #694

    Default Re: DEATH SQUAD strikes back!

    Even innocent persons being executed: police
    http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/ceb...ed.police.html

    The vigilantes hit again Thursday night, killing a 23-year-old man who was just standing in front of the shop he was working for along M. J
    Cuenco Ave., Cebu City.

    Homicide Section Chief Mario Monilar admitted that the attack was vigilante-style; the only difference from other incidents was that the
    killer wore a bull cap, not a ski mask.

    Monilar also noted that vigilante-style killing was used to execute hardened criminals in the past but lately, even those without criminal
    records have become victims.


    < snipped... >

  5. #695

    Default Re: DEATH SQUAD strikes back!

    hehe ok lang kung mutants sad na cla like x-men

  6. #696

    Default Re: DEATH SQUAD strikes back!

    Quote Originally Posted by mannyamador
    As long as there are *****s who think vigilantes are good, the EXCUSES for killing remain, and the killing will naturally continue!
    i think that's harsh. we don't have to resort to name calling if you don't want somebody's position. you don't have to stoop to anyone's level.

  7. #697

    Default Re: DEATH SQUAD strikes back!

    Quote Originally Posted by mannyamador
    Even innocent persons being executed: police
    http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/ceb...ed.police.html

    The vigilantes hit again Thursday night, killing a 23-year-old man who was just standing in front of the shop he was working for along M. J
    Cuenco Ave., Cebu City.

    Homicide Section Chief Mario Monilar admitted that the attack was vigilante-style; the only difference from other incidents was that the
    killer wore a bull cap, not a ski mask.

    Monilar also noted that vigilante-style killing was used to execute hardened criminals in the past but lately, even those without criminal
    records have become victims.


    < snipped... >
    wah! sensationalized title. the title was written in that way to sell more papers. the police were not certain it's vigilante killing.

  8. #698

    Default Re: DEATH SQUAD strikes back!

    Quote Originally Posted by cerebus
    wah! sensationalized title. the title was written in that way to sell more papers. the police were not certain it's vigilante killing.
    Like I've pointed out before, if we follow that logic then we cannot claim any beneficial effects from the vigilantes either since they cannot be identified. But the fact remains that murdering people in the streets is just plain wrong.

  9. #699

    Default Re: DEATH SQUAD strikes back!

    mas maayo na.ay vigilante sa cebu para mawala nang mga sagbot sa katilingban na mga holdupper og mga snatcher

  10. #700

    Default Re: DEATH SQUAD strikes back!

    Quote Originally Posted by mannyamador
    By the way, YOU said vigilanteism is an option for the jsutice system, whether vigilanteism is good or bad. And I precisely pointed out that you were wrong because something bad should not be an option for a justice system.
    Not all the time . You may have pointed it out as wrong because YOU THINK VIGILANTES are bad and not from the general public and the majority . For YOU , its not an OPTION . Misleading people again ?

    It has to be somethign good to be a viable option for a justice system (you do know what justice means, right?).
    Do you know what is JUSTICE in its purest form of DEFINITION ? Regarding the OPTION , read the reply above LOUDLY and CLEARLY for you to comprehend at least 3 times .

    So it is incumbent on you to prove that vigilantiesim is good.
    And how did that happen ? Like I said , look at the crime rate of Cebu . This is the logic here , CRIMINALS killing CRIMINALS ... and your wonderful and smart logic says that you want CRIMINALS kill INNOCENT people .

    But seeing how you can't even seem to grasp the most basic logical concepts, I doubt you weill ever come up with anything. If only you would try to THINK instead of trying to get personal and shooting your mouth off... but perhaps I'm expecting too much from you. Oh well...
    Speaking for yourself eh ? I thought you are smarter than that MR MANNY AMADOR .... tsk tsk tsk .

    Uh, in case you haven't figured it out yet, that's why they are ANTI-vigilante: because they think it's bad. Conversely, the pro-vigilantes think vigilanteism is good. Now do you really think belaboring the obvious makes you look more intelligent? Good grief!
    LOLZ .... you ended up on LOGIC , COMPREHENSION , CONCEPTS etc .... but you havent included how DUMBFOUNDING it is for PRO VIGILANTE to say that VIGILANTES are bad . LOLZ !!

    Considering you can't even comprehend it, that says even more about your mental maturity!
    Puso mo lolo ..... dental floss lang ang kinakapitan niyan . LOLZ !

    As long as there are *****S who think vigilantes are good, the EXCUSES for killing remain, and the killing will naturally continue!
    As long as there are people who cant give an REALISTIC OPTION for a better JUSTICE system ... they all resort to AD HOMINEM . LOLZ !! Hahahaha

    Even innocent persons being executed: police
    LOLZ .... at the point of your age , you should be able to differentiate what is VIGILANTE STYLE and VIGILANTES . Nice try mister MANNY AMADOR .

    " A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America

Similar Threads

 
  1. MERGED: All About RP-US Mutual Defense Treaty/ VFA-MLSA and Related Issues
    By CaliforniaKid in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 648
    Last Post: 04-16-2016, 06:19 AM
  2. MERGED: All About Hacienda Luisita and related issues
    By s.n.m.p. in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 369
    Last Post: 04-29-2013, 11:00 AM
  3. MERGED: All About MOTORCYCLE and JEEPNEY CHECKPOINTS, and related issues
    By Gray_Fox in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 257
    Last Post: 02-08-2013, 09:29 AM
  4. MERGED: RAMA-OSMENA Conflict, and related issues
    By tyler18 in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 338
    Last Post: 11-11-2011, 10:17 PM
  5. MERGED: All about the Lamp post Scandal and related issues
    By vipvip68 in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 645
    Last Post: 11-03-2011, 01:55 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top