i agree that our constitution should be amended. but remember that not only our congressmen and senators ang dapat lang bantayan specially kung economic side ang e ammend. we should always be vigilant sa mga lobbyist.
pero sa kadaghan congressman nato ngano c gloria man gyud ang mo file nga kbaw man ta tanan usa iyang kaagi? nya ang co author pa gyud iyang anak.
Mayta ilisan niya ang requirements para sa modagan pagka-president. Dli lang kay kahibaw mo basa ug mo suwat, pde na mkadagan as president.
i think ang problema is not in the constitution but in its implementation. sa ako lang.
@luskan
hahaha c'mon.. im not that stupid nga mgpataka lng ug post.. try to ask any economist about sa meaning sa unemployment rate.. i'll make it easier for u.. palit ug cebu daily news nga newspaper on friday.. adto sa editorial.. mka.kita kag article ni fernando fajardo.. he's an economist(a very good one).. naa na xay e-mail add.. you can ask him anything.. he's our teacher..
http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/pub...cms_100704.pdf
Bulatlat - The Philippines's alternative weekly magazine
NSCB - Statistically Speaking... WHO ARE THE UNEMPLOYED IN THE PHILIPPINES? by Dr. Romulo A. Virola
also.. try to read the following links above..
another video nga lingaw hehe
YouTube - The Unemployment Game Show: Are You *Really* Unemployed? - From Mint.com
@luskan
mao gani ingon ko atleast lessen it.. dli bah klaro? hehe
knang about sa recovery sa stolen wealth.. pwd paki.explain ana? khbw man kha ka unsa na? hehehe thnx..
ahw erap d.i ka? hehe
well she has alot of achievement perhaps, i guess exemptions to improve our economy.. ni daghan na hinuon pobre samot..
ka over jud ani mga press ug mga tao usahay oi.. himuon nmn showbiz ang pagka president ni noy noy
Posting a source from Bulatlat just diminished your credibility, anyway I respect your views regarding that the possibility unemployment rating could be more higher than that. But we must take note that the unemployment data is just following the core rules and should be not discredited, just because a certain author claims that there are certain people that are not included doesn't make it unreliable.
Similar Threads |
|