Hala kalouy ni LolzZz...kapuliki tawn tubag...
inyo man gitabangan mga bro ug sis![]()
speaking of FSM... medyo OT ni sa inyong discussion. some people, especially Christians, just don't get the concept of the great FSM. it seems absurd to them that we venerate FSM while it's perfectly normal to believe in their GODs. both GOD and FSM bears the same weight in the scale of critical skepticism. if you really think of it, it would be beyond absurd to go to Church every Sunday and worship a piece of wood (or perhaps talk to non-existent entity before you go to bed) than talk about FSM, which by the way, is only meant to dispute religion and Intelligent Design---nothing more, nothing less.
so get over yourselves, people. the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is open for worship. who's with me?
kabalo gud ka sayop na nga logic. and ang atong iscussion dili ka progress kay ili ka motobag kung pangutan.onm ka og tarung, sakto ba gudna nga debate? DILI oi. poro kabugalbugal. unsaon man nako pag explain nimo sa sayop sa FSM kung di ka mutubag kung pangutan.on ka og tarung, kung motobag mangani dili klaro kay naay sagol nga bbugal bugal, hahaha. feeling nimo satko na imong gibuhat? you think nga kanang style nimo can win debates? haha! logical fallacy na dong imong gibuhat.
@LolzZz: kinsa man ga suwat anang bible? ang God?
intawn pod ka assuming nimo. I know what SM stands for. it is an attempt to prove nga God and the bible are creations of delusional people.
but ang assumption sa FSMis wrong. and thats what i want to prove but unsaon nako pag prove if ang opponent motobag ra kung ganahan? or motobag ra ug bugal bugal?
sigoro hadlok siya e scrutinize iyang position.![]()
There are certain things that science could not explain what is in the bible. In short, science is too young to explain all about what is written in the bible. Before science the bible was already there and so as the religion...
tao nga adunay encounters sa ginoo.
hahaha na prove na nimo nga silly claim na akong gibuhat? wa man koy nakita nga argument nimo nga maka prove nga silly claim akong gipangsulti diri. poro ra man ka assumptions dong. thats no how real debates are done fyi.
ow di man gani ka kasabot kung unsa ng saktong debates samot ng logical fallacy.hahahaha....
Similar Threads |
|