Kinsa jud imo gituohan kung diin jud tah gikan, ang Bible or Science?

[schmuck]

how can i believe in FSM when there are no records that shows that it exist. is tis FSM of yours have Life? omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent?

no records? what do you mean?
You can order one right now! click

[LOLzZz]

no records? what do you mean?
You can order one right now! click

show me any data that somebody saw this FSM of yours. do yo have any official definition for this?

[schmuck]

show me any data that somebody saw this FSM of yours. do yo have any official definition for this?

Many have been touched by His Noodly Appendage. Everything you need to know is in the book. Need I ask if your god has any data of somebody seeing this god of yours?

Look at this website to see all the testimonies of people who have experienced the FSM in their lives.
What has your god got to offer?

[LOLzZz]

Many have been touched by His Noodly Appendage. Everything you need to know is in the book. Need I ask if your god has any data of somebody seeing this god of yours?

Look at this website to see all the testimonies of people who have experienced the FSM in their lives.
What has your god got to offer?

hahaha that was funny. but we know that it is deplete of seriousness. nice try ho, so how can i believe in FSM if it is all a joke?

so is there any official definition of what this FSM all about?

[LOLzZz]

ato ning bisayaon pagsulti nya gamay inglis para masabtan sa kadaghanan.

unsa man gyud ning Darwinian Evolution? matod nila kini kono osa ka pagosab sa trait sa osa ka creature pinaagi sa Natural selection,mutation,genetic drift. to illustrate kini daw nga osa ka isda after millions of years mahimong osa ka creature nga dili na Isda for example sigoro mahimo na kining crocodile.

okay..now...for a fish to evolve into a crocodile ang Genetic code sa osa ka isda kinahanglan adonay information nga pareha sa osa ka croc haron mo instruct sa genes nga mo produce og mga traits nga sama(like) sa crocodile.

kay kining informations nga makita sa genes sa osa ka isda para sa osa ka isda a pod. So kong walay information nga mo instruct nga matoboan siya og limbs impossible kaayo nga maka kuha og limbs ang osa ka isda. kuha ninyo?

so..there must be an additional or a step up or an upgrade sa informaion sa genes para makuha niya ang trait sa osa ka croc. so from a simple structured creature mahimo siyang complex structured creature kay mas modaghan man ang information.

Now in mutation,genetic drift,natural selection walay evidence nga kini maka hatag og additional information sa genes sa osa ka creature but instead and mahitabo ang kato rang present information ang maosab, NO ADDITION of INFORMATION. so kung walay addition unsaon ma pagkuha sa isda sa trait sa osa ka croc ? kung walay information nga mo instruct sa genes nga matoboan siya ug limbs unsaon pag evolve sa isda? dili ka evolve di ba?. hehe.

mao nay na observed sa mga scientists but ila ning gamiton nga theory to prove Darwinian evolution, nga ang osa kono ka isda puede mahimong crocodile w/c have never been observed sa ilang research.

what mutation,natural selection, genetic drift can do is maka produce ra og osa ka creature w/in sa ilang kind. meaning...ang Dalmatian nga Iro puede maka anak og laing klaseng Iro BUT IRO lang gihapon,hehe. No evidence that mutation,gnetic drift,natural selection can produce a differen kind. meaning nga ang IRO puede in million years ma transform into a cat. none.

so layo ra kaayo sa meaning sa Dawinian Evolution. Dawinian evolution propagates the idea nga ang simple structured creature mo evolve into a more complex creature. but those theory used to defend D.E shows nga dili kini mahimo. sa mutation lang daan instead naay additional info ang mahitabo ma loss man ang information hinoon.

so mao na. Evolution is not a fact. the evidence shows nothing.

[schmuck]

ato ning bisayaon pagsulti nya gamay inglis para masabtan sa kadaghanan.

unsa man gyud ning Darwinian Evolution? matod nila kini kono osa ka pagosab sa trait sa osa ka creature pinaagi sa Natural selection,mutation,genetic drift. to illustrate kini daw nga osa ka isda after millions of years mahimong osa ka creature nga dili na Isda for example sigoro mahimo na kining crocodile.

okay..now...for a fish to evolve into a crocodile ang Genetic code sa osa ka isda kinahanglan adonay information nga pareha sa osa ka croc haron mo instruct sa genes nga mo produce og mga traits nga sama(like) sa crocodile.

kay kining informations nga makita sa genes sa osa ka isda para sa osa ka isda a pod. So kong walay information nga mo instruct nga matoboan siya og limbs impossible kaayo nga maka kuha og limbs ang osa ka isda. kuha ninyo?

so..there must be an additional or a step up or an upgrade sa informaion sa genes para makuha niya ang trait sa osa ka croc. so from a simple structured creature mahimo siyang complex structured creature kay mas modaghan man ang information.

Now in mutation,genetic drift,natural selection walay evidence nga kini maka hatag og additional information sa genes sa osa ka creature but instead and mahitabo ang kato rang present information ang maosab, NO ADDITION of INFORMATION. so kung walay addition unsaon ma pagkuha sa isda sa trait sa osa ka croc ? kung walay information nga mo instruct sa genes nga matoboan siya ug limbs unsaon pag evolve sa isda? dili ka evolve di ba?. hehe.

mao nay na observed sa mga scientists but ila ning gamiton nga theory to prove Darwinian evolution, nga ang osa kono ka isda puede mahimong crocodile w/c have never been observed sa ilang research.

what mutation,natural selection, genetic drift can do is maka produce ra og osa ka creature w/in sa ilang kind. meaning...ang Dalmatian nga Iro puede maka anak og laing klaseng Iro BUT IRO lang gihapon,hehe. No evidence that mutation,gnetic drift,natural selection can produce a differen kind. meaning nga ang IRO puede in million years ma transform into a cat. none.

so layo ra kaayo sa meaning sa Dawinian Evolution. Dawinian evolution propagates the idea nga ang simple structured creature mo evolve into a more complex creature. but those theory used to defend D.E shows nga dili kini mahimo. sa mutation lang daan instead naay additional info ang mahitabo ma loss man ang information hinoon.

so mao na. Evolution is not a fact. the evidence shows nothing.

two words:
retroviral insertions

All that effort to "binisaya" and just two words. BAM!

Iro to cat? <- are you that ignorant?

[schmuck]

hahaha that was funny. but we know that it is deplete of seriousness. nice try ho, so how can i believe in FSM if it is all a joke?

so is there any official definition of what this FSM all about?

Are you saying those are not as funny as Cheesus, the Dog Butt Messiah and The Holy Toast? Come on. That's double standard.

So how? Why don't you still believe in the All Noodly One?

[remz399]

mga ahak. .!!

god relly exist for me so dapat bible tah. .!!

[LOLzZz]

two words:
retroviral insertions

All that effort to "binisaya" and just two words. BAM!

Iro to cat? <- are you that ignorant?

hahaha...ow it was just an illustration.

Are you saying those are not as funny as Cheesus, the Dog Butt Messiah and The Holy Toast? Come on. That's double standard.

So how? Why don't you still believe in the All Noodly One?

im trying to make a sense out of your FSM here, obviously it lacks proof. and again does your FSM has the attribute of God ?

so whats the official definition of your FSM? did your FSM create the world? did your FSM create life?

by the way the FSM book was obviously made for mockery. so why believe in it? you know what Igot this feeling that you are trying so hard to push FSM into the argument, its not making any progress.

[devilsburger]

bible is there before we are born and science is just a matter of ones observation that came from facts, myths or whatsoever..although science plays a big role in our society just like what we are having right now with the technology like gadgets, computers, airplanes, cars and stuff like that..