I doubt naay maayong laki maka kopya sa bokeh or dof sa mahalon nga lenses thru photoshop.
85mm f/1.4 = photoshop? Di mada oi.![]()
I could be wrong, pakita lang mi sa sample photos sa imong migo.
on second thought... photoshop is a very powerful tool, and I think it can "ALMOST" duplicate the effects of what a lens can do... but with many months and perhaps years editing on it... and such a waste of time and maybe perhaps after the editing is done, he/she must have missed alot about photography
Siguro sa mga dili kaayo suhito molantaw sa bokeh, dili kaayo nila makita ang difference
pero i suggest go for the lens ka nalng bro, usahay kapoyan naka sige edit sa photoshop later...
yeah you can do bokeh on photoshop using lens blur. But imagine doing that for 200-300 pictures for a wedding.
my opinion, if bokeh lang imo giapas, i think photoshop (never under estimate the power of photoshop ^__^) can duplicate those naa sa pic but not the sharpness of the images if you'll examine it closely and it will take you time to edit those things..
if nahan gyud ka ug photography, go for the lenses.
if your into image manipulation, buy a P&P cam at least 3.2 or 5MP up. then practice with photoshop CS5 ug lightroom 3.
here's an example:
raw file: lens:18-55mm
PP using CS4 & lightroom 2.7: (newbie pa ko)
![]()
Your friend is not a photographer he/she is a photoshoper and there is a big difference... a very good photographer told me, in photography, to "DO IT RIGHT THE 1st TIME" and blowing more time in PS than taking GOOD/GREAT pictures is not the right way.
yah, spend more time shooting rather than facing the computer doing PP - nabasahan ra ni nako sa lain thread![]()
Gamay raman difference on price between a license post process software like photoshop ug mahalon nga lens. Or labot sa istorya ang pirated softwares ani?
para nako mas nindot ug original lenses.... but if wla kay lenses nga mahalon nga naay 1.4 to 2.8 aperture? then patabang jud sa photoshop.
Similar Threads |
|