grabe noh...maskin RESPECT nlng pud unta gud sa mga Christians ui...wala man unta ginapugos na mutuo bah, pero kung dili mutuo ug Ginoo, respeto nlng pud unta gud sa nagatuo...
@TS: will do my part as well...
grabe noh...maskin RESPECT nlng pud unta gud sa mga Christians ui...wala man unta ginapugos na mutuo bah, pero kung dili mutuo ug Ginoo, respeto nlng pud unta gud sa nagatuo...
@TS: will do my part as well...
Something else about what Ramini said:
I guess what you're saying is that you lament that there are "seriously biased devout people" in FB? But that can't be avoided, can it? We all have biases, and it's unavoidable I think that social networking sites like FB will have all sorts of people with widely divergent views that are biased. There are people who believe in God and Jesus, so they're in a sense biased. But there are no doubt atheists in FB, too, so they're biased also, in a sense. So the issue here I think is not a person's bias, but about the kind of material that is allowed in FB.
From what I can see, FB considers the following as violations of their Statement of Rights and Responsibilities:
1. Nudity or pornography
2. Impersonation
3. Racist/ hate speech
4. Targeting an FB account holder or a friend
5. Direct call for violence
6. Excessive violent content
7. Spam
I think the page violates the third item. It's not racism obviously but it promotes hate against a religious group or groups.
Oh no not again.
Pati sa facebook naa na?
![]()
wala jud tay mabuhat anah, bisag e.report pa na nin.u, suma dghan kaau nudity pics sa f.b, mga racist etc...
atay, bantog ra nag ingon ani ni cya ky muslim man diay ning animal!!!! tga indonesia,
sussss... unya inyong Allah terrorista! hahaha
Similar Threads |
|