
Originally Posted by
raski
The bully is the one who resorts to personal attacks. Also i never said you were an internet lawyer. I said you are internet lawyering for the Radazas (in other words you are defending them using legalisms.)
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and in my opinion you dodge the issues. The readers are free to review all your 30 posts to see who is right.
Well that's too bad, but whether or not my tone is arrogant is not the issue. I am anti-corruption, hence anti-Radaza, that does not mean I'm pro-Pelaez. The only reason you would say that is because you are new here and have no history here, that is why you are completely ignorant of the fact that well before you showed up I already said that I am of the opinion that I don't know enough about Pelaez or the other candidates, and they may be even worse than Radaza. See how wrong you were? If you weren't so presumptuous you wouldn't fall flat on your face all the time.
Perhaps you should, you'll be surprised how even kids can teach some people certain things.
The root of all this was your personal attacks. Still trying to wiggle out of that?
In other words you dodge the question again. What happened to discussing things? What happened to the healthy exchange of ideas on topic? I'm going to ask the question again:
IS IT OR IS IT NOT A FACT THAT SUPPLIERS CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN THE BIDDING UNLESS THEY HAVE BEEN PRE-APPROVED AS QUALIFIED BY RADAZA?
This is not a court of law. It is a place for discussing and debating ideas. If you want to practice your lawyering, then it is you who should go to court. And since you avoid questions that you cannot answer, I'll assume that you don't have any.