Future in Lapu-Lapu politics

[PascualDelaSerna]

---

this just my opinion... you mean without watchdog they cannot do there job properly or honestly? if this irregularities happens because there are no watchdog then they don't deserve the position they have. people put there trust to this officials and so they should give it that back without stain..

as to they unproven allegations, i think we should stop this...

It's just like a public hearing...if you don't attend it, you have no business complaining about its outcome...

Yes, we should stop unproven allegations...if we do have evidence, then we should file complaints in the courts of law...after all, the right to due process is a hallmark of a democratic society...

[PascualDelaSerna]

[QUOTE=bearish;7032551]what do you mean by "err...intellect"? your cousin might not complain anything with regards to their use of computers. be aware that we are not talking about the use of computers, we talk about the transaction to acquire such computers, not the end-user's complaints.

you are correct, that we don't have the first hand information, but we have basis to suspect that they do hokus-pokus as there are obvious irregularities. First, the specs that was delivered is inferior to what was ordered, second, the price per unit is too high even compared to a regular quality specs. we know that it is too high as we are in the industry wherein we regularly buy computers. what is so special to this computer units when the government is purchasing them compared to private people buying?
As you see, we have basis to suspect. If you would like to offer explanations or counter our suspicions, please make it appear that you are not fooling us.

Again, it goes back to the bidding process; cheaper-priced suppliers could not be awarded the contract if they did not participate in the bidding. Hence, even if the government ends up buying higher-priced units, it has no choice if the bidders who participated all offered higher prices. More so if there is only one bidder left if the others failed to qualify due to technical problems like lack of permits, SEC/DTI accreditation, etc.

I can't help it if you always sound suspicious of anything...most people are... but if you have to trust the courts of law which are the duly-instituted authorities mandated by the constitution..otherwise, the only other available option are the revolutionary courts which are extra-legal and anti-constitutional.

I have no intention of fooling you...just trying to relay what I know...

[PascualDelaSerna]

what do you mean by "err...intellect"? your cousin might not complain anything with regards to their use of computers. be aware that we are not talking about the use of computers, we talk about the transaction to acquire such computers, not the end-user's complaints.

you are correct, that we don't have the first hand information, but we have basis to suspect that they do hokus-pokus as there are obvious irregularities. First, the specs that was delivered is inferior to what was ordered, second, the price per unit is too high even compared to a regular quality specs. we know that it is too high as we are in the industry wherein we regularly buy computers. what is so special to this computer units when the government is purchasing them compared to private people buying?
As you see, we have basis to suspect. If you would like to offer explanations or counter our suspicions, please make it appear that you are not fooling us.

if you talk about courts of law, again, i'm sorry to say, that agency is suspicious too, specially when the involves are sharks.

Again, it goes back to the bidding process; cheaper-priced suppliers could not be awarded the contract if they did not participate in the bidding. Hence, even if the government ends up buying higher-priced units, it has no choice if the bidders who participated all offered higher prices. More so if there is only one bidder left if the others failed to qualify due to technical problems like lack of permits, SEC/DTI accreditation, etc.

I can't help it if you always sound suspicious of anything...most people are... but you have to trust the courts of law which are the duly-instituted authorities mandated by the constitution..otherwise, the only other available option are the revolutionary courts which are extra-legal and anti-constitutional.

I have no intention of fooling you...just trying to relay what I know...

[raski]

You still fail at answering questions Pascual, so let me reiterate the most pressing question that needs answering.

IS IT OR IS IT NOT A FACT THAT SUPPLIERS CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN THE BIDDING UNLESS THEY HAVE BEEN PRE-APPROVED AS QUALIFIED BY RADAZA? In the spirit of lawyering, since you're so fond of forum lawyering, a yes or no answer would suffice. Do not try to distract the issue again by raising other concerns unrelated to the question. It is after all a simple question in plain English that even a three-year old can understand, so I would expect an internet lawyer of the Radazas to understand it as well.

[PascualDelaSerna]

Dong Erik naghisgot man unta ka ug baload sa imo previous post pero wala nimo kini basaha pag-ayo. Ang unang buhaton dodong kun mopalit ang gobyerno ug butang mohimo kana sila ug Purchase Request (PR). Sa PR nasulat diha ng kompleto na specs sa ilang paliton. Inig human sa bidding mohimo dayon ug purchase order (PO) ang gobyerno diin i serve kini sa winning bidder para ideliver ang mga item nasulat sa PO. Ug kun unsa gani ang nasulat sa PO kinahanglan na tumanon jud sa supplier , puede palabwan ang specs pero nungka modeliver ug inferior na produkto.

Murag dakung sayop ang imong interpretation sa "would be disadvantageous to the government". Ang gideliver sa Kein is Celeron, pero ang presyo na gibayad sa gobyerno ang presyo sa Pentium IV, mao kana ang tinoud na "disadvantageous to the government". Ug dili ang pag delay sa release. VERY POOR m,an ang imong interpretation sa balaod dodong.

Kun ato subayon ang imong interpretation, mao kini: bahala na maalkanse ang gobyerno sa specs kay inferior, unya sa presyo pud kay ang gibayad presyo sa Pentium IV pero ang gi deliver is Celeron , basta madeliver lang ang computer! ... tsk tsk tsk , kinsa man intawon inyo adviser OI!

Mao diay na ang COA ni -issue ug Notice of Disallowance. Kahibalo ka unsa na siya dodong? Pasabot ana wala mo approve ang COA sa mao na transaction, considered na siya na null nd void. Ang pasabot niini iparefund ang total amount na 24M. tsk tsk tsk.... kinsa man intawon inyo mga IT experts ug consultant oi na dili kaila sa deperensiya sa Pentium IV ug Celeron. Mas mayo pa man siguro ang mga high school students kahibalo pa.

Uny duna pa koy lain na gisulti dong erik: Sa documentation nga nahipos sa COA wala jud gi mention didto na nag-explain na Celeeron ang gideliver sa supplier Kein. Sa ilang pagreview, ang gideliver according sa record is Pentium IV jud. Unsa man pasabot ani? Gitago ug gihilom ang kamatouran na Celeron ang gideliver dili Pentium IV. Didto ra kini nabutyag sa pag random inspect mismo sa COA sa mga high schools sa Lapulapu. tsk tsk tsk . . .

May I intercede?

The COA is part of the government process of check and balance...its usual policy is post-audit, not pre-audit...hence its resident auditor found out about the change in specs after the delivery, not before...i don't think it was purposely concealed from COA; the procedure was just so because of the latter's post-audit policy...by the way, COA also has a policy of not attending meetings aimed at clarifying transactions, etc...even if you ask its resident auditors for an opinion on official transactions, they will only say "it's your call, after all, we will only do post-audit..."

A notice of disallowance is also a normal occurrence in government agencies...there is probably no single government agency that has not received a notice of disallowance at one time or another...
still, a notice of disallowance can be subject to an appeal or a motion for reconsideration...after all, COA is not an arbitration body like the Ombudsman, the Sandiganbayan or the courts...and even these bodies' decisions are also appealable...

COA's notice of disallowances may also be lifted if a government agency can justify a transaction that has been disallowed by its resident auditors...the lifting of notices of disallowances are also a dime a dozen in government offices.

So, just because COA issued a notice of disallowance on the computer purchase, that doesn't mean that the transaction is already deemed as anomalous with finality...its decision may still be overturned by a pending appeal or motion for reconsideration...

Lucky, I commend your interest in government procedures like COA's moves...as responsible citizens, we should always uphold due process and administrative remedies provided for by law...

[PascualDelaSerna]

You still fail at answering questions Pascual, so let me reiterate the most pressing question that needs answering.

IS IT OR IS IT NOT A FACT THAT SUPPLIERS CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN THE BIDDING UNLESS THEY HAVE BEEN PRE-APPROVED AS QUALIFIED BY RADAZA? In the spirit of lawyering, since you're so fond of forum lawyering, a yes or no answer would suffice. Do not try to distract the issue again by raising other concerns unrelated to the question. It is after all a simple question in plain English that even a three-year old can understand, so I would expect an internet lawyer of the Radazas to understand it as well.

I'm no internet lawyer, just as I would like to believe that you are not an internet bully...

I am not distracting, that's just your opinion.

I opine that you tone is arrogant and condescending, but I'm not saying that that's typical of Pelaez supporters...let the readers judge that...

Unrelated to the question...again, you are entitled to your own opinion.

As to three year-olds' minds, I'm no expert at your amazing first-hand knowledge of and voice of experience on toddlers' psychological capacities...

And let me just point out that all these irrelevant issues came from you first; I only replied to them.

Finally...a simple yes or no from me wouldn't matter because I'm no judge; I'm not even a lawyer...however, you can prove it by filing a complaint supported by notarized testimonies of suppliers at the ombudsman, sandiganbayan or other courts of law...

On your most pressing issue, you should have filed the corresponding complaint a long time ago...

[plantze]

[QUOTE=PascualDelaSerna;7032664]It's just like a public hearing...if you don't attend it, you have no business complaining about its outcome...

hmp... i don't like this idea. we put our trust to this people to govern but then we still have to tell them they are on the wrong or its not feasible... LOL i guess they don't deserve the office where they are now....

[PascualDelaSerna]

[QUOTE=plantze;7033572]

It's just like a public hearing...if you don't attend it, you have no business complaining about its outcome...

hmp... i don't like this idea. we put our trust to this people to govern but then we still have to tell them they are on the wrong or its not feasible... LOL i guess they don't deserve the office where they are now....

I respect your idea...but citizens' participation in the affairs of government makes for a better country...so, instead of just holding on to your "guess," it would be far better if you empower yourself towards nation-building...

[plantze]

hahahaha i see how you build a nation now... i see the other way.

good luck to you and candidates you're vying this election.

i would still love people that governs our nation could run the office with less supervision...

[PascualDelaSerna]

hahahaha i see how you build a nation now... i see the other way.

good luck to you and candidates you're vying this election.

i would still love people that governs our nation could run the office with less supervision...

Your negativism is not surprising...most Filipinos today aren't happy about their country...but what can we do? This is the only country we have and to help make it strong, we must pitch in by actions and not just by words.

Let's not leave the affairs of the state to others...that's being lazy...perhaps, the reason why our nation has retrogressed badly is because its citizens do not anymore contribute positively and concretely to its progress...

Good luck to you and the candidates that you are supporting, too. God bless!