FREE MASONRY - the Principles

[mannyamador]

---

WHAT IF DERS AN ANTI-CATHOLIC ARTICLE?? wud u believe the speculations or stories?..

I do what any intelligent person does. I THINK. I examine the evidence in the article. I see if there is corroborating evidence. Now THAT seems to be a technique you don't know about. No wonder that you can't separate fact from fiction!

[Jacks]

@manny:

hehe, i believe there is no need to insult anyone here concerning their intellect...

also, it would be a given that ALL the people posting here aren't monkeys, these are humans who can think... therefore, it would follow that these people also "think"... even the dumbest of humans do that...

that being said, it would be fair to say that these people have also examined articles [those you've given and those they've seen through their searches and from asking "people"] if they should believe it or not... therefore, if these people are not inclined to agree with your views, it might be wise not to push it further as it would just make posts redundant [as some of your posts have been] and might reach a point [like right here/now] where you'd resort to insults...

also, this is a topic about Freemasonry... if you like to talk about Anti-freemasonry, it might be better to make a separate topic called "Anti-freemasonry" or "The lies of Freemasonry"... or if you like to talk about Catholism vs. Freemasonry, another topic for it also might be helpful... i believe the admins/mods here wouldn't mind if another topic is made [although correct me here if i'm wrong admins/mods]...

@ others

excuse lang ninyo akong english bay... english lang kunuhay ko kay aron makasabot ning atong usa ka kauban diri... hehe... *popcorn*

[Archer sensAtion]

WHAT IF DERS AN ANTI-CATHOLIC ARTICLE?? wud u believe the speculations or stories?..

I do what any intelligent person does. I THINK. I examine the evidence in the article. I see if there is corroborating evidence. Now THAT seems to be a technique you don't know about. No wonder that you can't separate fact from fiction!

hehehe...and now ur pretending to be intelignt?...

...so meaning the accusations that you pointed to the freemasonry are FICTIONS...yeah!...haha

naa pay pa technique2x hahahaha...

you must have first hand information b4 u give specualtions about freemasonry...

[mannyamador]

hehehe...and now ur pretending to be intelignt?

You still don't get it eh? Oh well.

you must have first hand information b4 u give specualtions about freemasonry.

Wrong. You DON'T. if we follow that wrong logic, then you may as well throw the entire study of history out the window (which you have, actually, as seen in your posts) since none of us can have first hand information of events hundreds or thousands of years ago. Much of science will go the same way too.

Argumentum ad absurdum.

[i_a_m_d_e_d_e]

correct.

[Archer sensAtion]

@Manny

freemasonry is different from a history of DINOSAURS...(duh?!?)

...and ofcurz your accusations wer wrong, so u need to have first hand information...

[mannyamador]

freemasonry is different from a history of DINOSAURS...(duh?!?)

But the rational methods used in history are the same. You don't need first hand information to determine if certain events happened. Therefore, we DON'T need first hand information to know if certain events in the history of freemasonry are true.

Therefore, your argument is still in error. Argumentum ad absurdum.

[Jacks]

himo lain topic uy adto mo paglalis... nawa na nuon essence ani nga topic da...

[Gwynhuever]

^^ usika tawn sa imong iningles bro oi...monas ginhawa ra ba tawn to nimo ug compose wa man japun kasabot he he he

[Archer sensAtion]

hala istorya ta lain... gahi man gud to ug uts ang isa...hehehe

guys unsa inyo lain mga question?(ayaw nang mga questions pareha kang manny, kay yupak na,dili sad about religion)...ask lang mo, basin mka answer mi blackwidow ana...

...juice sa beh, natuk-an ko sa popcorn...