true, true. just like the 18-55 mm kitlens. it produces more bang for the buck which is what most people new into photography is considering. but don't get me wrong. a better lens would be a very welcome addition don't you think? heheas you go deeper into photography, dili jud kalikayan ang mangita ka ug lens that would give you more freedom to be creative.
anyway, back to the topic. i think 80-200 is a very good lens also. though VR would be a welcome addition but you really don't need it unless you'll be shooting at speeds slower than 1/100 (if you have good hands) or 1/200. so consider your budget. kay mao man imong primary limitation. 80-200 i think has got more bang for the buck. heck... i have a 70-300 4.5-5.6 and i really love using that baby.
@hayden: ok ra kent.. hehehe.. medyo busy pa skwela.. cge lang last hunat nalng.. hehe.. makadaot jud ni ang skwela sa atong bisyo.. hehe
salamat sa nang reply..
lisud kaayo abton ang VR.. hehehe.. if mag kremil-s ug tubig cguro for the entire year basin makapalit na ug VR.. hehehe..
Similar Threads |
|