I only support evolution up-to the variation of kinds. Planet formation, chemical evolution, biogenesis, and the geological columns have very little to gave us. Its not even convincing as scientific method is concerned.
Planet formation - still no answer. Earth is formed by superhot collision of something they say. But the more serious question is how did it happen and how did water survive on this temperature... again, nothing has been found nor even accepted in the science community. Sure we can all make theories, its just a matter of how good is your theory...
Chemical Evolution - You need star/sun to create elements and you need elements to create star. So which comes first. Did it evolve?
biogenesis - scientist are looking is it from the sky, from the water, or from the land. Or are we coming from alien world... this does not answer biogenesis. Environment just don't support single celled lifeforms we know of today.
geological columns - age of the earth is never accurate or should we say never known. Layers of rock suggested time and age... but where did this dirt come from? erosion with the given span of time does not make the story true and correct.
Evolution can be tested with science. Unfortunately, science did not find it satisfactory. Variation of Species does make a solid findings for it is already observed.
A new breed of scientist who wants to prove their THEORIES are welcome, but it does not mean they are right.
Evolution a lie in Science?
Posting Permissions
