certain seller na mka lagot au!!!!!

[marcial1985]

---

to mokikoy - here is my word.. keep calm.. kung gusto ka masettle ni..

first nana sa owner ang money ana u gipalit nako..

second thing,, and imo gi big dealan ana is the warranty right? kay ga expect ka dugay dugay pa

right? thats the bottom line

[dominate]

daghan na kaau'g profile visits c marcial1985..

[commonsense]

duha ra na kabutang sis, di niya iuli kay nagasto na ang kwarta. or di niya iuli kay kabalo na xa nga padung na mo xpire ang item mao gidespatsar niya ang item by hook or by crook.

ok ra man mosulti sa tinuod nga nagasto na ang money..makasabot pa ang buyer. lain jud ang feeling nga tay taw nga ma agrabyado or magdumot nato.. kwarta ra na, mawala, makit.an.. pero ang dignidad sa taw dili na jud na mauli once madaot or maguba na..

bitaw, isettle lang unta peacefully.. yaw nalang mo anang senseless na mga attacks with each other.. dili man na makasolve sa issue.. ang ako lang, hinaot mauli ang fon sa TS..

[marcial1985]

to m-garz nasulti na nako dapat masulti...

[marcial1985]

yup
dghan jud ni ngtanaw ako profile...

[jheartfred]

before ta ninyo mo sleep ato lang e pray nga ma peaceful na ni sila duha. wlay au ang gubot tama or mali man ang seller/buyer...

@seller i know and feel na God fearing ka bro your always saying God bless, Simba or the likes... but imo lang jud pride ang dli nimo e go down but i know kasabot ka side sa buyer ky buyer mn pud ka.

@buyer, ayaw lng jud ug kasuko bro keep cool lng mo sugot ra lagi na si marcial bsta tarongon lang ninyo sabot otro.

stop na personal attack mga bro ky lain na kaau apilon pa ang love ones...

God: Love Your Enemy
satan: Hate You Enemy/brothers/sisters.....

SATAN does not always say bad words bro. we know that.

he can dress up even as a PRIEST. so no need to buy that crap of saying god bless and in reality does not even fear it.

sakto ka bro that dili need mag lalis but sometimes we need to express what we think is right. after all mao ni reason why ISTORYA.NET exist.

[mokikoy]

tarung mn gd au ko nangutana ug nihangyo niya gnina bro.. ni txt jd ko nya nga "ako sa ni ipakita ang phone sa ako sis ug parents kng ok ba nila.. kung dli gni kay pwde i-uli lng nko?"

ako bya ni ihatag sa ako sis bro kay ako xa gipapili between e72 and e75.. mas ganahan mn xa sa e75 gd before gipalit nko ang e72.. ang nka pait kay kahibaw ako parents about sa warranty.. mao na wla ganahi ako parents kay gi-ilad ko.. bisag sila nka basa sa nokia care na receipt.. mao na ingun ako parents kng mg ginahi daw na si marcial kay tabangan ko nila ma solbad ang kaso namong 2.. daghan mi mga kailang dagkong tao mga bro.. d mn sa ga salig mi nila pero mka tabang sd na sila..

ug bisag kinsa mka hibaw ani among transaction mka ingun sd jd sila na sayop ang seller.. bisag kamo nka ingun sd mo ana..

[mokikoy]

to mokikoy - here is my word.. keep calm.. kung gusto ka masettle ni..

first nana sa owner ang money ana u gipalit nako..

second thing,, and imo gi big dealan ana is the warranty right? kay ga expect ka dugay dugay pa

right? thats the bottom line

and ur point is? tiwasa bro.. please.. wla kay bottom line.. wala ko kasabot.. wala na process sa akong above average nga brain.. or let me say above zero level brain..

[jheartfred]

ok ra man mosulti sa tinuod nga nagasto na ang money..makasabot pa ang buyer. lain jud ang feeling nga tay taw nga ma agrabyado or magdumot nato.. kwarta ra na, mawala, makit.an.. pero ang dignidad sa taw dili na jud na mauli once madaot or maguba na..

bitaw, isettle lang unta peacefully.. yaw nalang mo anang senseless na mga attacks with each other.. dili man na makasolve sa issue.. ang ako lang, hinaot mauli ang fon sa TS..

mas better tingali sis if ato usbon ang last phrase : ang ato lang, hinaot mauli ang kwarta sa BUYER.. he is the victim ani nga case.

[Fubu]

only copied important ones. from dti



1. What is the legal basis of the prohibition on the “No Return, No Exchange” policy of business establishments?

Pursuant to the Implementing Rules and Regulations of R.A. 7394, or the Consumer Act of the Philippines, specifically Title III, Chapter 1, Rule 2, Section 7 of Department Administrative Order (DAO) No. 2, Series of 1993, the words “No Return, No Exchange”, or words to such effect shall not be written into the contract of sale, receipt of sales transaction, in any documents as evidence of sale, or anywhere in the store or business establishment.

2. What is the rationale for this provision?

The prohibition is aimed to correct the misconception of a lot of consumers today that they do not have the right to return shoddy or defective goods or demand for remedies, in case of defective or imperfect service because of the “No Return, No Exchange” notice in the receipts or anywhere in the business establishments.

3. Why is the presence of a “No Return, No Exchange” notice considered deceptive?

Such statement is considered deceptive because consumers may return or exchange the goods or avail of other remedies, in case of hidden faults or defects, or any charge the buyer was not aware of the time of purchase. By provision of law, sellers are obligated to honor their implied warranties and grant corresponding remedies to consumers.

6.Can a store exercise only a policy of exchange but not refund?

Consumers are entitled to either an exchange or refund, as long as there is a defect in the quality of goods or imperfection in the service.

7.If the defect is due to mishandling on the part of the buyer, can he/she still return the item and demand and exchange or refund?

No. The prohibition covers only hidden defects, shoddy goods or imperfect service.

8.If after buying a certain item, a customer changes his/her mind and wants to return said item. Can he/she invoke the prohibition on “No Return, No Exchange”?

No, the prohibition is not an excuse for the consumer to return the goods because of a change of mind.

9.Is there a time limit within which a buyer may return defective products?

There is no hard-and-fast rule on the period within which a customer may return the products he purchased. A rule of reason should, however, be observed, taking into consideration the nature of the item purchased and the express / implied warranties mandated by law, i.e. Consumer Act and the New Civil Code of the Philippines.

The best remedy for this is to return the phone to the seller and the buyer be given a full refund since there was admittance that the information provided on the item prior to purchase was false. End of story.