
Originally Posted by
The_Child
as ive said, currently one could not for certain prove whether rizal retracted masonry or not. it is a hotly debated topic in rizal studies. now unless of course you could present a concrete proof that rizal did not, then i will have to yield to you. but since you do not have any concrete proof, then i stand with what i said.
am i implying? if you read my post properly, what i said was, my professor who is in Filipino studies (among other things), thinks that the institutionalization of crab mentality in low-land filipino consciousness maybe attributed to Rizal's novel. His justification was that nowhere in the two novels do you see a Filipino being praised, nowhere do you see the Filipino succeeded, every where you see that the Filipino always fail, always fall. You see filipino's acting against each other. and why institutionalized? because this has become a required subject and reading, (we have to thank the late sen. Claro m. recto for that)
He even states that Rizal's plot in his noli me tangere was a almost the same to a spanish novel that rizal read during his time in spain. the characters et al - Benito Perez's Dona Perfecta. (as you can see, if you read me clearly, it is not me but my professor who said such things, i am not my professor, im merely sharing his view which are not mine)
another professor from the ateneo(sociology) states that we have always demonized Church and Crown (spain) and we are too blinded from our colonial biases to see the great benefits that colonialism has given the nation. refer to dr. zialcita's Essays in Filipino Identity.
maybe your teacher ought to publish that article in a refereed journal, and if he/she did, you might want to tell me, so i can comment. for now, ( i think )either your statement referring to your teacher is a fictional acccount, or your teacher might be very simplistic, or he might actually be on to something, or he might be just saying things he could not justify.
AND between your statement stating that Rizal did not retract from masonry and my statement that there is no certainty for now that Rizal retracted or not, who do you think is more one - sided? you who states rather categorically something without justifying it ? or me who stated merely a status of the debate in rizal stuies that it is for now not certain whether he retracted or not? now who is being one-sided e?
crab-mentality exists everywhere true. but i am not talking about everywhere, i am talking about the Philippine situation and the cultural and historical forces that shaped this phenomenon in our nation.
to avoid taking too much space for unwarranted replies, please read carefully my posts.
cheers!
p.s among other fallacious statements, you first of all presume im a philosophy professor, secondly, grantign that its true (which is not), what has it gotta do with all your statement that i am so ? --- exactly, NOTHING. its a non-essential ending for a post.