
Originally Posted by
Pein
basin ang pagtuo nila false religion ang vatican 2 nya true religion ang vatican 1...pareho raman nang false! hehehehe!

i dont have to justify myself to lesser creatures.
But one thing in mind, as i was conversing with a baptist pastor one time, i asked him why is it that most if not all christian sects share the tradition with the Church of having the four gospels accounts (luke, Matthew, john, mark) as the canonical text in the bible, whereas there are as many as 100+ gospel accounts by different authors? why do they follow the Church of having this four gospel accounts and why not use the others?

Originally Posted by
bungot25
Even if the pope is an antipope? you still support the church?
the problem is we could not know for certainty that there really is a sede vacante, could we? that is why there is Faith. basic catechism teaches us that it is the Holy Spirit that will guide the church. for me, i leave it to faith. the politics of Rome are merely peripheral issues. we should not confuse the tree for the forest. and besides, I dont like to relish too long on conspiracy theories.

Originally Posted by
Hellblazer 2.1
but how will God answer?
one would know. you could not use a scientific yard-stick. This is Faith. And as ive earlier said, its a gift.

Originally Posted by
LightBearer
The_Child...what's the difference between Vat. 1 and 2?
they are church councils, the former occured in the 19th century while the latter around the 20th century. I dont want to break into detail, so you might want to ask mr. google.
my professor would joke that in the third vatican council, the bishops will be bringing their wives, while in the fourth vatican council they will be bringing their husbands.