
Originally Posted by
oliver_g0110
Have you heard of Gnostics Gospels?
Here is a two-part article on the Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown:
Part 1 of a Special Planet Envoy Critique of The Da Vinci Code
Part 2 of a Special Planet Envoy Critique of The Da Vinci Code
Read on and throw in your additional questions.
Here is an excerpt of part 1:
In addition, there is the misleading notion that the Gnostic writings are consistently pro-woman, while the New Testament writings–and thereby the authors of those books–are anti-woman. This idea also arises in The Da Vinci Code. After quoting from the Gospel of Mary Magdalene, where Peter complains about Mary’s closeness to Christ, Sir Leigh Teabing states: "I daresay Peter was something of a sexist." (p. 24
. He then remarks that "Jesus was the original feminist. He intended for the future of His Church to be in the hands of Mary Magdalene" (p. 24
.
But Brown never bothers to have his characters quote from the final verse of the Gospel of Thomas, the most famous of the Gnostic texts. That verse states: "Simon Peter said to them: ‘Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life.’ Jesus said, "I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven" (v. 114). This passage and others like it do not fit well with the feminist view of the Gnostics, just as the Church’s positive treatment of women throughout history does not compare well with the negative picture often depicted by feminist groups.
Here is also a two-part article on gnosticism:
Gnosticism and the Gnostic Jesus
The Gnostic Gospels: Part Two
Thank you.