unsa nindot ilearn na programming language

[kamsky]

---

And yet another fairy tale to prove.... The temptation to form premature theories upon insufficient data is the bane of our profession, and don't even try to back up your point without any reliable findings, don’t just post a link that supports all of your STUPIDITY!

what's next? Airlines? Aerospace? Engineering?

What an IDIOT trying to biased all things. If we were keen to avoid certain topics, it was probably more because it embarrassed us.

well i work in a bank and I know not theories. you can even try searching powerbuilder jobs in google. it's not dead. it's like everyone said cobol is dead but not really.

[bluedes]

that's a broad coverage to answer. maybe you can give me what's the limitation of ms access, and one by one we'll map if powerbuilder can do it or not.

sure, fair enough.. you mentioned that PB can have non-visual objects, what do you mean by that?

[kamsky]

sure, fair enough.. you mentioned that PB can have non-visual objects, what do you mean by that?

an object without visual component. You can have data and logic. i would imagine that it can create class as like vb/delphi.

I'm not reading the article just reading the code write away.
Sybase.com

You can share/distribute the non-visual object too:
SpringerLink - Journal Article

I can understand why PB has so many followers until now.

(Help! PB programmer should explain better)

[MarkCuering]

well i work in a bank and I know not theories. you can even try searching powerbuilder jobs in google. it's not dead. it's like everyone said cobol is dead but not really.

work in the bank? what bank is this? local bank? and what makes you proved that banks uses alot of PBs? can you enumerate?

Man, I told you already...try not to back up your point without any reliable findings, don’t just post a link that supports all of your STUPIDITY!

what is in that PB's that banks must use?

[MarkCuering]

an object without visual component. You can have data and logic. i would imagine that it can create class as like vb/delphi.

I'm not reading the article just reading the code write away.
Sybase.com

You can share/distribute the non-visual object too:
SpringerLink - Journal Article

I can understand why PB has so many followers until now.

(Help! PB programmer should explain better)

mau diay ni imong pasabot sa non-visual objects? unsa diay ng Visual Studio puro lang diay na visual objects? kanang WPF sa .NET unsa man main advantage ana bai? kana diay COM Objects, visual diay na? saunz nmn ni woi...

[sinus_]

wow. 9 pages for "unsa nindot ilearn na programming language" na thread.

[kamsky]

work in the bank? what bank is this? local bank? and what makes you proved that banks uses alot of PBs? can you enumerate?

Man, I told you already...try not to back up your point without any reliable findings, don’t just post a link that supports all of your STUPIDITY!

what is in that PB's that banks must use?

Don't worry mark, I am reliable

Big banks, investment and commercial. Example? Barclays and BlackRock.

(You can also check with BPI. I saw the screen of the manager and it 'was' powerbuilder)

I told you to search powerbuilder jobs in google and you will see and that's a good evidence already. "Dont understimate the intelligence of the masses" you know.

It's not 'must' use, I am sure some other tools can do these too. The question is how convenient it it to the developers? PB is not a "general" tool, you know. General means can do everything, master of none. These tools are created for convenience. Trimming down unnecessary fetures and adding features that makes sense for the usage. Yes flexibility might suffers, but they focus on how the tool should work (PB is focus in db and hoping a CEO could create pb program .

Companies such tools for convenience. Convenience is proportional to productivity. Profit.

In short there is an always place for powerbuilder.

[kamsky]

mau diay ni imong pasabot sa non-visual objects? unsa diay ng Visual Studio puro lang diay na visual objects? kanang WPF sa .NET unsa man main advantage ana bai? kana diay COM Objects, visual diay na? saunz nmn ni woi...

Mark,

Murag nisimang man ka bro. Wala man tingali nilalis nimo sa capability sa .net. Your so overreacting. Pangutana daw sa uban basin nasayop ra ko.

You're comfortable with your tool? Fine. Just respect what others have.

[bluedes]

an object without visual component. You can have data and logic. i would imagine that it can create class as like vb/delphi.

I'm not reading the article just reading the code write away.
Sybase.com

You can share/distribute the non-visual object too:
SpringerLink - Journal Article

I can understand why PB has so many followers until now.

(Help! PB programmer should explain better)

yeah, but how does it do that? thru powerscript?

msaccess can do that also.. declare non-visual objects thru visual basic..
it has its own sets of controls and UIs..

what does PB do that sets it apart?

[MarkCuering]

for convenience sake...I agree!