View Poll Results: Do you agree with the ban on wedding rites that are held outside churches?

Voters
37. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    11 29.73%
  • No

    23 62.16%
  • No comment

    3 8.11%
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 39 of 39
  1. #31

    Depende ra gyud na sa tawo nga magpa kasal asa ug unsa ila gusto. Pero for me, i prefer sa church jud. Was married in a catholic church.I don't even prefer civil wedding. I want a solemn marriage vow. That's just my belief. Everyone has his/her own.

  2. #32
    whats the purpose of marriage?


    ngano mo insist man jud ang simbahan sa ila jud.. simbahan ra jud diay naa power ana?


    asus,, kadaghan ra marriage sa church nga didnt performed well.. naa baya pud uban, civil lang pero maau ila marriage.. naa gani uban live-in2x lang pero maau gihapon ang dagan...


    kanang sa church or any other places, ceremony ra na.. ang importante kay ma pirmahan ang marriage contract..

    just like baptism gud.. you really dont need to be baptized to live or have a good life.. its only for ceremonial purposes

  3. #33
    Dapat nato i-break down ang reasoning sa Archbishop ani iyang order. Unsa man ang mga sides ani nga arguement?

    Sa ako lang makita, 2 ka aspects ang importante ani, SOLEMNITY, COST ug PROFITEERING.

    Kung storya lang ta ug SOLEMNITY, like saying nya walay blessing ang marriage outside the church (the actual building), dili ko maka agree ana.

    Naa sa Bible, Mathew 18:20 "Where ever 2 or more are gathered in my name, there I am with them."

    So kung sa kani lang ato tan-awon, si Jesus Christ nag ingon nga wala na sa lugar ang Solemnity kundi naa na sa mga tao ug sa ila intention nga mag-ka pundok.


    Kung COST atong storya-an, well, personally, naka attend ko ug wedding sa church nga dili gyud engrande. Actually, wala gyud anything, no flowers, no nothing. The Sacrament of Marriage is FREE!! What happened was, nag Regular mass, then after sa Mass, ang couple, ang pari ug ang witnesses, kay nag Solemnize sa Sacrament of Marriage. So ako guess ato kay wala gyud ko gasto, or if naa man gani, hatag ra sa pari/simbahan (gratuitously).

    Try asking your parish priest kung naa ba bayad ang Sacrament of Marriage.

    Following that arguement, dili sakto nga reason nga dili magpa kasal sa simbahan kay walay budget, kay again, the SACRAMENT OF MARRIAGE IS FREE... (or at least it should be)


    On the issue of PROFITEERING, thats up to each one of us to interpret the actions of the parish/church. If sa ato panan-aw, pangwartahay ra, then we can find instances nga tinuod.

    FYI lang: The Catholic church is probably one of the richest organizations in the world, based on the Real Estate they own (all those churches, parishes), and the art work they own (those paintings, sculptures in the Vatican), not counting the other holdings of the church. Pero I know of this priest sa amo parish nga nasakit while he was on a trip to Hawaii (different issue na ngano naa siya sa Hawaii). He was hospitalized for several days, nya syempre dili man free ang hospital, so what happened was nag collection diri sa amo church para tabang sa medical expenses niya. Ok na ang pari karon ang ok na siguro iya medical bills. Ang ako lang question is, nganong dili man insured by the Vatican ang ila mga pari? Off topic na ko ani, pero it relates to the arguement of PROFITEERING.

  4. #34
    I know a neighbor who had planned to have their wedding at Imperial Palace. The neighbor and the soon-to-be-spouse are both Catholic.

    With Rosales' declaration, now the wedding plan is in trouble.

  5. #35
    well catholic churches are losing income hehe obviously

  6. #36
    ngano mag buot mani sila asa mag pakasal ang taw
    kung dili pud mag pakasal ila pud i condem

    i educate ang mga taw before mo adto sa media para mag pa ban

  7. #37
    di ko uyon ani, pero kung ako kaslon, ganahan gihapon ko sa simbahan. mura'g mas solemn and mas proper man gud. but what about those people who want their weddings in pretty gardens and beautiful beaches, diba? i don't see anything wrong with that. as long as a real priest presides over the wedding, why not? if the couple is in love, and are god fearing individuals, i don't see anything wrong with that.

  8. #38
    agree
    the priest is the one giving the blessing on behalf of god dili ang statue ni lord

  9. #39
    solemn baya jud ang wedding ...............

  10.    Advertisement

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

 
  1. Looking For: affordable wedding emcee, church choir and make-up artist
    By wenlove24 in forum Health & Beauty
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-05-2013, 05:03 PM
  2. Looking For: mu sing sa church and reception( wedding)
    By mitchy in forum Specialty Services
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-27-2012, 04:41 PM
  3. Wedding: Church or Civil or Both?
    By chadix24_7 in forum Relationships (Old)
    Replies: 1125
    Last Post: 10-18-2010, 10:38 AM
  4. girls, k ra ninyo civil wedding wy church
    By ed168III in forum Family Matters
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-04-2010, 11:59 AM
  5. Can someone get a church wedding for only 30k?
    By catnip23 in forum "Love is..."
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 03-16-2010, 12:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top