The Bible and Evolution

[newtonscousin]

---

your position states that God authored the entire book, am i right? so as a follow up answer i told you that your argument falls under the shade of circular reasoning w/c is for your information a logical fallacy.

you gave me those verses as proof, in a legal court setting giving evidence via circular reasoning is stupidity, don't expect your case to reach the finish line.

a legal court cannot solve this issue if that's how your logic goes. so its stupid if ill give evidence to the court that the earth is a continuation process of never ending cycle?

and here is another problem...if god is the sole author of the book then why does it contain contradictions and the literary output differs from each other?

can you give me some?

[hizuka007]

sa akong nahibal-an, ang mga moevolve lang man kay ang mga zerg... ang mga terran dili man, except kung mainfect sa zerg.

[kebotDiNaMute]

ah so you can't spot the difference between the word mamersonal and personal. not my problem.

mamersonal denotes attacking a person's dignity. asking a personal question like unsa imong nahoman is not. there is no element of aggression. unless mabaw jud ka ug panabot.

mamersonal denotes attacking a person's dignity
--- avoid asking names... avoid asking personal questions... asking name is personal, you know why? because u already know the ALIAS. Why in the world would it matter to you if its John Doe or not... hmmmm

[Gotterdammerung.2]

yes you can see the chicken and the egg! but you are moving away the focus, does it solve the problem? NO, STILL NO.

you saw our BIBLE, and you Heard our Jesus. Does it solve your problem, No.

score:

YOU have two problem.. EVO and FAITH

ME have one.. EVO

so whos solving things now? please stay FOCUS.

Good thing is, you lead by score... i lead by solution...

hay nako...tarunga og storya oi ayaw putla putla. incoherent napod ka.

[kebotDiNaMute]

a legal court cannot solve this issue if that's how your logic goes. so its stupid if ill give evidence to the court that the earth is a continuation process of never ending cycle?

can you give me some?

Court never honor Faith, but they respect it.

Court is scientific, and logical.

Faith can win court by Intention and Motive.

Science can win court by Fact.



If the issue is chicken and egg.

scientific: Court will ask you for scientific Occurrence... and logical reasoning

faith: Court will ask you what is your case? since there is no intent nor violation. Court only investigates Laws and Violations.

But it seems this forums tells us Believing is a VIOLATION, this is the very similar case to communism.

Never use the court of law to question the Freedom of Believing after all no harm is done.

[Gotterdammerung.2]

a legal court cannot solve this issue if that's how your logic goes. so its stupid if ill give evidence to the court that the earth is a continuation process of never ending cycle?

what can you enlighten me pls, how on earth is this related to our discussion? Can you please at least hit the chunk of the main issue and avoid hitting on minor points.

so i made mention of legal court and...this is your response? sorry i can't find the connection.

what I said was, if you use circular reasoning in a court room you will hit bottom.

can you give me some?

sure. let's try Jesus Genealogy. Are you familiar with it? the usual answer is, luke is mary's and matthew is jospeh's? now its your turn to elaborate.

[kebotDiNaMute]

hay nako...tarunga og storya oi ayaw putla putla. incoherent napod ka.

hehehe! REASONS NI? hahaha! nag samool naman ka brad? pagarpar man gud.

[Gotterdammerung.2]

mamersonal denotes attacking a person's dignity
--- avoid asking names... avoid asking personal questions... asking name is personal, you know why? because u already know the ALIAS. Why in the world would it matter to you if its John Doe or not... hmmmm

why can't I? the man being questioned has the option not to answer. just say the word, no comment. closed.

[newtonscousin]

what can you enlighten me pls, how on earth is this related to our discussion? Can you please at least hit the chunk of the main issue and avoid hitting on minor points.

so i made mention of legal court and...this is your response? sorry i can't find the connection.

what I said was, if you use circular reasoning in a court room you will hit bottom.

you know what i mean if your really a logical person.

sure. let's try Jesus Genealogy. Are you familiar with it? the usual answer is, luke is mary's and matthew is jospeh's? now its your turn to elaborate.

can you give me some verses bro pra ma klaro.

[Gotterdammerung.2]

Court never honor Faith, but they respect it.

Court is scientific, and logical.

Faith can win court by Intention and Motive.

Science can win court by Fact.



If the issue is chicken and egg.

scientific: Court will ask you for scientific Occurrence... and logical reasoning

faith: Court will ask you what is your case? since there is no intent nor violation. Court only investigates Laws and Violations.

But it seems this forums tells us Believing is a VIOLATION, this is the very similar case to communism.

Never use the court of law to question the Freedom of Believing after all no harm is done.

ah your making a speech. that's good keep the spirit up...go go go...