LADLAD Partylist?

[crazyme82]

lets accept the fact nga d pa dyud ready ang pinas ani...

[SioDenz]

murag dili man gyud na pwede ang same ***.. pero naa bya bayot na-legal gyud nakapag-asawa.. well from the start kay sayop na man daan iya birth certificate gibutang man na female siya so... pagkuha marriage license kay na kakuha gyud siya...

same *** na.. and techinically legal siya sa tn-aw sa ato balaod...

unless maghimo ta ug law na ang mka-minyo ra kay ang man ug woman.. na ang pasabot sa woman kay kanang naa ovary or born with a vagina...

nya pwedi man sad magpa *** transplant maam..hehe lusot japon..

[digitalart]

sus mga bayot mga wa gyud nay ayo

[SioDenz]

but because they are congressmen and senators already... these "gays" are not working for the benefit of the other "gays".

IMO Comelec had no right to ban the party.

Benefit like same *** marriage? naa man nah sila rights ug benefits As A HUMAN Being. di pa sila kontento ana?
If ngita pa sila lain Benefits mao nah na naka way ayu ana, ang ending ani mangita nah sila ug lain gusto nila mahitabo nga supak sa teachings sa church. Mao nah sa mubo pa ang sagbot angayan ibton kay ig daku na mahimong kahoy lisod nah..

[SioDenz]

You sure are tough online. Before, you said anime should be banned because it is "immoral".

And now here you are urging readers to "destroy" the Separation of Church and State.

Lastly, you declared a certain minority to be outlawed. Why outlaw people based on their sexual orientation? That would be a violation on their human and civil rights.

Ok nah daw niya ang anime kay naka amgo siya nga ang iya picture iya gi post murag dagway ni Guy Senei sa naruto..joke... hehehe

PEACE!

[FKtemp]

onsa plataporma sa ladlad?

represented na man kaau sila, naa gani senator sa una na sakop sa federation.

[Malic]

mu-agree mo sa comelec decision sa pag-deny sa ladlad as a partylist on the ground of morality?

kay tungod 3rd *** sila wala sila right mahimong partylist?

They should change the name of their party, too vulgar and does not sound good. They lack the needed preparation.

I think the decision of the cOMELEC is wrong.

[cirext]

Kay anarchy diay ug masulod ang Ladlad party sa congress? hehe, mora ug imbalance imong "rights", bro .. on the other hand, di ka gusto ug simbahan nga moapil apil sa state .. unya on the other hand, you imposed your religious bigotry (PEACE!) or morality on the Ladlad Party List .. haha .. join ka na lang nila and then reform them from the inside; for me, it is not a question of morals or not, that they are accepted or rejected by the Comelec, the Ladlad Party should take their issue in the hallowed halls of the Supreme Court WHY they should be admitted to the Congress! Bro, dili siguro anarchy ug anaa sila sila kagahuman, kundili a n a l chy siguro .. hehe

Never did I tell that Ladlad would lead to anarchy.
Collapse of moral values or becoming too liberated or becoming too much for "freedom of expression" would lead to collapse of systems, which is anarchy.

I mean balance.
Upholding the right Christian values. What is wrong should be wrong. What is right should be right.
Without oppressing other people.

Seems difficult to understand.
But the simple summary is "To be a real Christian in thought, in deed & in principles."

[masterjanuarius]

Never did I tell that Ladlad would lead to anarchy.
Collapse of moral values or becoming too liberated or becoming too much for "freedom of expression" would lead to collapse of systems, which is anarchy.

I mean balance.
Upholding the right Christian values. What is wrong should be wrong. What is right should be right.
Without oppressing other people.

Seems difficult to understand.
But the simple summary is "To be a real Christian in thought, in deed & in principles."

Why impose only "christian" morality? which "christian"? what about the non-christians? should they be burdened with christian morality too? what about those who call themselves "atheists", animists, freethinkers? we all say "separation of church and state .. and then impose "christian" ideals on all?

[sharkey360]

Why impose only "christian" morality? which "christian"? what about the non-christians? should they be burdened with christian morality too? what about those who call themselves "atheists", animists, freethinkers? we all say "separation of church and state .. and then impose "christian" ideals on all?

Let me add that secular law and principles are needed to achieve balance for people of different faiths and no faiths at all.