One Cebu Party - Objective is for all the Garcias will be Positioned in Cebu Politics

[giddyboy]

Let me correct you Winston Garcia was not a top honcho of GSIS he was a TAPHAW HONCHO OF GSIS.

Thats the opinion of the writer what matter most is the legacy, the change and the progress they brought to Cebuano. Osmeñas did that!

well, don't correct me. Correct the writer of that article instead.

honcho per definition, is one who is in charge, a manager, or a leader.

I don't think the writer went wrong in his definition.

Yes, all that is the opinion of the writer, no doubt about that. But what you also said is an opinion. But which of you two has more verfiable facts as basis?

I also hope you will come to realize that it is not only the Osmenas who brought changes to Cebu. There were other political clans and honchos out there who also contributed to the growth of Cebu.

---000---

Back to the topic, if "some" people perceive One Cebu as a machine for the Garcias to be positioned in politics, and the Garcias alone, well sorry but we also have to acknowledge the reality that they are not the only ones doing it. AFAIK, 8 Osmenas are already running now for public office, confirmed or not.

I know that many of you here perceive many Garcias (whether by personal bias or not) running for public office as a bad thing. But we have to be fair to acknowledge that not all people think the way you do. Many people also think that many Osmenas running for office is also a bad thing. Many people also say that enough of the Osmenas. Some also say it's about time that they be replaced with people who are not landed elites and not using extreme bossism to advance their political interests.

[raboy50]

gikiha man ang IBM sa GSIS. yes, I do believe that even if IBM f_cked up, still managot pa rin ang GSIS because of that failure. Mao btaw it is interesting that an international and reputable company like IBM can f_ck up this time, BIG TIME.

Basin gamay nalang ang pondo sa GSIS mao pasangil nalang sa IBM mga bakakon raba kaayo ning mga Garcia sama ni Gwen sige ingon 2 billion ang kwarta sa province nya 500 million nalang diay ,ingon sab sya iya power point nga gasto sa CICC 500 million ra nya niabot diay ug 800 million. Naay Pablo John sige panghambog sa iyang congressional inquiry sa SRP nya asa naman ron.Gi unsa man ni pagtudlo ni Pabling ang iyang mga anak puro mga bakakon.

[giddyboy]

Basin gamay nalang ang pondo sa GSIS mao pasangil nalang sa IBM mga bakakon raba kaayo ning mga Garcia sama ni Gwen sige ingon 2 billion ang kwarta sa province nya 500 million nalang diay ,ingon sab sya iya power point nga gasto sa CICC 500 million ra nya niabot diay ug 800 million. Naay Pablo John sige panghambog sa iyang congressional inquiry sa SRP nya asa naman ron.Gi unsa man ni pagtudlo ni Pabling ang iyang mga anak puro mga bakakon.

well, u can call it still as pasangil or allegation coz the case is still in the courts. But we have to acknowledge the fact it is IBM, and IBM alone who is running all the GSIS computers.

as i also said again earlier, some people may just be confused between "surplus" and "available funds". I am not an accountant so I dare an istoryan here to shed light on those definitions.

[gikapoy]

well, u can call it still as pasangil or allegation coz the case is still in the courts. But we have to acknowledge the fact it is IBM, and IBM alone who is running all the GSIS computers.

as i also said again earlier, some people may just be confused between "surplus" and "available funds". I am not an accountant so I dare an istoryan here to shed light on those definitions.

ulitimo raman ko nga empleyado sa IBM...
pero sa ako na kit an... tanan nga ila gi support naa jud back up
dili lang pud basta2x ang mga clients nila
kasagaran clients dako pa kai sa GSIS

[higanstolsdawen]

naa nasad laing hinanggaw ron sa GSIS, katunga nalang ang nadawat sa pension sa akung ugangan hasta papa sa akung officemate. unsa kaha ne? ato nasad basulon ang IBM ane kay tungod sa ilang system?

[gikapoy]

accdg to news reports, gikiha man ang IBM sa GSIS. yes, I do believe that even if IBM f_cked up, still managot pa rin ang GSIS because of that failure. Mao btaw it is interesting that an international and reputable company like IBM can f_ck up this time, BIG TIME.

lisod manubag kung ang problema naa sa user
why blame the computer kung ang user ang cause sa problema

[giddyboy]

lisod manubag kung ang problema naa sa user
why blame the computer kung ang user ang cause sa problema

well, that is only ur assumption: ang user ang cause sa problema, and not the computer system.

[gikapoy]

well, that is only ur assumption: ang user ang cause sa problema, and not the computer system.

dili lang na ako assumption sir
ang sa IBM pud
naka basa ko sa news ambot asa to nga link
naa pud mga taw diri nga sa ila tan aw nga GSIS side ang issue

[giddyboy]

dili lang na ako assumption sir
ang sa IBM pud
naka basa ko sa news ambot asa to nga link
naa pud mga taw diri nga sa ila tan aw nga GSIS side ang issue

well, i dunno about that. could be. AFAIK, nag kinihaay ning duha, GSIS vs IBM ug IBM vs GSIS...

I am also not sure about users sa IBM system. AFAIK, usually the users are just following what computer system is there in place and not the other way around that the system is following the user.

you say u r working for IBM and that makes you a candidate for bias in favor of IBM, am i correct?

again, we cannot totally blame IBM if indeed it was their system that sucked. Blame this also to GSIS for getting a system that sucked.

[linogzkie]

wayuk gyud ning mga garci da,, este... garcia....noy pabling payter kaayo,,,,