Which is better man jud? Nikkor 18-135mm or 18-105 VR?

[vanix09]

di mn ko nikon user, canon mn ko..pero kng IQ gani n lens, prha sa g.ingon ni arguel and his formula, the lesser the gap between the wide focal n tele focal sa lens mas nindot jd ang IQ, maybe it has something to do with the number of elements sud sa lens, not sure..

this is regardless though kng VR or non-VR, i'm talking bout IQ and lens mn, kng kurog gni dli na sala sa lens, sa ngkupot na nah..hehe.. =)

btaw2.. i agree..

[vanix09]

mas nindot gyud na dili kaayo ka magsalig VR/IS.

agree pud ko ani.. nice2..

[bir2]

go for 105 dude... lahi rajud ang VR og dli.. ^_^ 100+ focal length, claro najud au ang shake. ^_^

[vanix09]

@bir2: di bro oi.. murag bati man sad kaau kung magsalig lang ka pirmi sa IS/VR sa cam nimo.. hehe.. XD

[chinitaphile]

18-105mm VR bro. It's better to have VR and not need it than to need VR and not have it. I don't mind the 20mm lost in reach.

Unsa diay lens gamit nimo run bro?

[harvz86]

kalas pod battery ang VR / IS...hehehe

[vanix09]

@chin: 18-135mm bro.. so far so good! nice kaau ug bokeh2.. usa sa pambato nga feat. sa 18-135mm ang nice bokeh.. XD

@harv: really bro? kalas diay? hehe.. XD

[P-Chan]

my vote goes to the 18-105vr.. i hear daghan nag complain sa 18-135 ero it's still a good lens for beginners

[vanix09]

@p-chan: i see.. pero depende ra ghapon na sa shooter bro oi.. saon manang VR2 thing kung di pud diay kahibaw.. dba?

[djsparechange]

mas hayang ang 105 compared sa 135, try shooting at same settings labi na sa shutter, see the difference. love both lenses though