
Originally Posted by
jamesmusslewhite
There has to be a established Morality standard. Genghis Khan, Ivan the Terrible, Henry the Eight, Attila the Hun, Vlad the Impaler, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Nixon, or George W. Bush. Were liked by those that saw them as Moral, and even thought of themselves as moral; which is a problem. There has to be an accurate measuring stick. Religious Moral codes provide accepted social standards, many do not follow them but they give us the standard in which to judge their actions.
Man's Morality can change on a whelm or vary person to person. The standard must inflexible, unbending, set in stone. God only gave us 10 laws and if we followed them, we would not need the 50 Titled Volumes of law books in the US which contain the tens of thousands of laws used in the US alone.
so mao lage na inu gusto.. to control people and to limit what they can do to what you consider moral.. im an enemy of that idea.. genghis khan, hitler, stalin, ivan the terrible, st francis, gandhi, mother theresa are all great people.. we just judged them differently..
we are not slaves to any man made laws, we are not prisoners of morality..the fear of being immoral oftens prevents people from achieving greatness..
example lang ha.. cloning.. what wonders could be discovered if these are studied more.. possible cures for cancer, aids, other deadly deseases.. but its considered immoral by many, so human progress slows down.. the priests would say, money is immoral, to become rich is immoral.. so the poor would fear becoming ambitious for this will make him immoral.