there is no conflict if you view them separately. conflict arises when you view the two altogether.
you talking about "The Science of Creationism"? that's an oxy*****. science and creationism can't go hand in hand. science involves critical thinking. creationism is not science. therefore, you do not use critical thinking when you believe in creationism. how can you scientifically explain creationism? you simply cannot. it's kindergarten LOGIC.--- ooops creationism is scientific too... you are the one who eliminated these ideas, in the process you omit the process of critical thinking... what about that?
when is a scientific theory considered a lie? last time i checked, you can never brand something a lie unless you can accurately disprove it. your GOD is in fact, not a lie, but it can never be proven---so it is not the truth either. so why be conclusive?--- because its a lie... its never proven true and correct... right? So how do i know its a lie? simply because cannot be proven. what do you call that?
where in that statement did you get the impression that i'm recruiting you? work on your comprehension.--- see you want to recruit me... and you are lying to tell me you are not selling your ideas... hay mga bakakon jud.
this is nothing more than a biased, prejudice view of atheism. you can't actually present FACTS to support your statement.If your numbers are right... with all those numbers, how come your athiesm failed on the aspect of charity... can you please tell us why giving is not good? I got an answer already... athiesm exclusive para sa mga "LAMOT", "MADAMOT", "GREEDY". Gud luck to your greedy whatever...
you talking about "The Science of Creationism"? that's an oxy*****. science and creationism can't go hand in hand. science involves critical thinking. creationism is not science.
--- thats because you don't use critical thinking...
your GOD is in fact, not a lie, but it can never be proven---so it is not the truth either. so why be conclusive?
--- so do you suggest that believing and not believing stands on the same faith? tell me?
when is a scientific theory considered a lie? last time i checked, you can never brand something a lie unless you can accurately disprove it
--- well in morality, if cannot be proven true and correct its definitely a lie. Check out the court of Law.
where in that statement did you get the impression that i'm recruiting you?
--- bakakon
this is nothing more than a biased, prejudice view of atheism. you can't actually present FACTS to support your statement.
--- i already posted a thesis on giving.. that athiest gives less to none...![]()
circular reasoning. what can you expect...
rational and irrational thinking can't be on the same boat. so no, they are not the same.--- so do you suggest that believing and not believing stands on the same faith? tell me?
to recruit is to employ someone; to enroll. that is not my purpose in this thread. did i tell you to come join us? kebot is setting up one of those linguistic traps again. too bad for you coz i don't fall for it.bakakon
this is nothing more than a biased, prejudice view of atheism. you can't actually present FACTS to support your statement.
--- i already posted a thesis on giving.. that athiest gives less to none...
atheist gives less to none? again, no FACTS. please, spare me the bullsh*t.
to those proclaiming to be "atheist" :
is there any scientific study that has scientifically proven that there is no god?
and for those "believers of god" : what do you think your god will do if he's reading chad_tukes posts about him/her?
questions lang.. *peace*
Similar Threads |
|