Are environmentalists good or bad for Cebu?

[sharkey360]

---

These environmentalists should talk sense. Cebu has an ongoing power crisis and some of them don't care about it.

It's a good thing the editorial was published so that the public will learn the different kinds of enviromentalists.

[gikapoy]

awa unsa nahitabo sa manila.. kung naminaw palang sila sa mga enviromentalist nga naa sense.. basin dili ingon ana ka grabeh ang nahitabo hehehe

kung ang cebu cge na ug abusar sa ato environment.. good luck nalang

[eax]

Maayo unta dili sila pareho sa Karapatan or any cause oriented groups na one-sided lang ilang gi-tanaw.

[Psalter Spectre]

Check this editorial out

Take the case of Cebu. If the uncompromising pseudo environmentalists would have their way, they would shut down all coal-fired power plants this coming Sunday, while God is resting, and never mind if we all get transported back to the Stone Age.

Source - EDITORIAL - Environmentalists | The Freeman >> The Freeman Sections >> Freeman Opinion

Well we have to consider their clamors after all they want to preserve Cebu from becoming an island of pollution; The opposing parties should meet and settle things to diminish environmental degradation without sacrificing the province's productivity

[gikapoy]

Well we have to consider their clamors after all they want to preserve Cebu from becoming an island of pollution; The opposing parties should meet and settle things to diminish environmental degradation without sacrificing the province's productivity

agree
kasagaran nga environmentalist kai kahibaw sa ila gi pang reklamo
example: waste product (coal ash) sa i tambak sa mai mangroves .. isda adto mangitlog ug mo kaun
ang isa kaunon dayon sa taw

atong isda ma sagolan ug coal ash

[misha lang]

compromise both sides lang.

[AmorsoloX]

while nag storya nman lang ta enviromentalists share lang nako ni.. hehehe

recycling.. there are many instances that recycling consumes more power than the production of goods itself.. which means more coal are burned to process waste products than to create new products... which means more air pollution

naa jud times nga the landfill is more environment friendly and cost effective of dealing with garbage...

recycling is good, but there are times it does more harm than good..

before we take any action. we must first study the effects and costs of such action..

the word here is sustainable development.. there's no point in going back to the dark ages and theres no point in killing the planet.. balance lang ba....

[masterjanuarius]

Ang atong environment kinahanglan atoang ayuhon pag gawom kay kita ra pod unya ang magkalisod in the future .. ang environmentalists kinahanglan nato aron magbantay sa corrupt nga mga opisyal nga magpabaya sa environmental issues. Duna tay mga provisions para ma minimize ang pollutions sa emissions sa mga coal plants .. pero gi follow ba ni sa mga tigdumala sa mga planta? ug dili lang unta magpabayad ang atong mga opisyal, okay unta atong environment. Usa pa, kusog ang current sa hangin sa mga bukid sa cebu, ngano dili i harness para maka generate ug electricity? Usa pa, ang mga bungtod sa cebu mga upaw na, nganong dili mag tree planting aron makatabang sa pag absorb sa CO2 sa atmosphere?

[Psalter Spectre]

agree
kasagaran nga environmentalist kai kahibaw sa ila gi pang reklamo
example: waste product (coal ash) sa i tambak sa mai mangroves .. isda adto mangitlog ug mo kaun
ang isa kaunon dayon sa taw

atong isda ma sagolan ug coal ash

yep .. if we try to look on the credentials of those environmentalists ... some of them are chemical engineers, one of my instructors happens to be one of them

[pinoyapache]

yep .. if we try to look on the credentials of those environmentalists ... some of them are chemical engineers, one of my instructors happens to be one of them

In short...they know what they are talking.