Humans Are Still EVOLVING

[mlhl@7]

---

I think this will correlate on human adoptation to environment I am not so sure.. but this will make a sense..

Most obvious thing to observe is the athlete evolution.

[Ger]

well we adopt but it does not mean we acquired new traits like flying... if we take environment as basis for evolution, who decided its time for monkeys to shed hairs and show some skin... people living in cold places dont grow hair all over their body...

[rodsky]

people living in cold places dont grow hair all over their body...

That's not Darwinian, that's Lamarckism ( Lamarckism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ) which is an erroneous (and thus abandoned) idea of evolution.

-RODION

[Ger]

@mlhl@7, @hobie, @cromagnon

then you are wrong mister...

[-shinobi-]

nag evolve jud to bay but too slow for us to notice.

[Ger]

nag evolve jud to bay but too slow for us to notice.

again another theory... kung kinsa to gaingon dakog skull ang primitive nga taw, unsaon nimo pag-explain ang size ni broc lesnar...? or the tallest man? carbon dating has its flaws...

[rodsky]

kung kinsa to gaingon dakog skull ang primitive nga taw, unsaon nimo pag-explain ang size ni broc lesnar...? or the tallest man?

Those are exceptions to the rule. Look up:

Acromegaly - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gigantism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Exceptions cannot be the rule.

carbon dating has its flaws...

1. First, please read this entry:

Radiocarbon dating - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. Next, tell me exactly which section, in this entry, has this supposed "flaw", and do be specific and use proper scientific terminology to explain it, and then, paraphrase those explanations into something that a layman can understand.

If you can do that, then perhaps you can indeed convince people reading this thread, that radiocarbon dating has flaws. Otherwise, your argument doesn't hold water.

-RODION

[Ger]

Those are exceptions to the rule. Look up:

Acromegaly - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gigantism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Exceptions cannot be the rule.




1. First, please read this entry:

Radiocarbon dating - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. Next, tell me exactly which section, in this entry, has this supposed "flaw", and do be specific and use proper scientific terminology to explain it, and then, paraphrase those explanations into something that a layman can understand.


If you can do that, then perhaps you can indeed convince people reading this thread, that radiocarbon dating has flaws. Otherwise, your argument doesn't hold water.

-RODION

quite outdated but it will do -- Carbon dating accuracy: what are the flaws of carbon dating?

now regarding Gigantism, how do you know that, what was uncovered and claimed to be a predecessor of man is not just some freak mutation?

[unregistered]

Can we consider homo and bi sexuality a manifestation of human evolution?

[diehard96]

we will inevitably be able to control how we will evolve, maybe we will eventually use technology to enhance human capabilities and even our physiological and physical features.

transhumanism perhaps?
Transhumanism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Humanity+