
Originally Posted by
mannyamador
And I am saying that the idea should be disregarded as there is no justification for it. Same thing.
This is the same answer that was refuted yesterday.
It makes a clear factual error. You claim that prostitution has no victim. I have shown that it DOES have victims. So your "answer" does not show why prostitution should be considered for legalization while murder, rape, child prostitution, etc. should not. Your argument still falls to reductio ad absurdum.
That's because ytou have failed to show why your claims about prostitution -- that it is old, ineradicable, can be regulated, and can earn the government income -- cannot also apply to these other crimes. If those are your justifications for considering legalization of prostitution, then these justifications also apply to rape, murder, and child prostitution. Bit since this is also absurd, your reasoning is faulty.
Reductio ad absurdum. Look it up.
And while you're at it, try to crime up with an answer. Or at least have the intellectual honesty to admit you are wrong.