Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[kebotDiNaMute]

---

Take note of the lines that are highlighted:

Kebz, per your understanding... do you think science is all about lies?

kebz, do you really know what is ICE CAPS? What are the chemical components?

DNA is some kind of complex program? Are you sure?

Kebz, per your understanding... do you think science is all about lies?
--- oops, the lie part is EVOLUTION. You don't see the point do you? hmmmm...

kebz, do you really know what is ICE CAPS,
--- trip going technical? hmmm, good excuse, but the evidence does not support the claim... TRIP don't be silly... we are no scientist here who talk about technical things... relax

What are the chemical components?
--- are we gonna stick to your evolution topic or we talk about chemistry... stay focus...

DNA is some kind of complex program? Are you sure?
--- omg, trip i tot you are one of a kind.. hahaha! yea one of a kind pretender.. tsk tsk tsk...
Crick later developed this idea in his famous "sequence hypothesis," according to which the chemical parts of DNA (the nucleotide bases) function like letters in a written language or symbols in a computer code. Just as letters in an English sentence or digital characters in a computer program may convey information depending on their arrangement, so too do certain sequences of chemical bases along the spine of the DNA molecule convey precise instructions for building proteins. Like the precisely arranged zeros and ones in a computer program, the chemical bases in DNA convey information in virtue of their "specificity." As Richard Dawkins notes, "The machine code of the genes is uncannily computer-like." Software developer Bill Gates goes further: "DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created."

basa ms. trip para ka maka sabot unsa dna... pa spoonfeed paman oi.

Am I wrong to tell you that... so if i am then reklamo ad2 nila ayaw nako...

[kebotDiNaMute]

I dont get it... and immature you say? if you think maturity is licking others butt then - "girl, we are in different wavelengths"

hahaha, thats might be the reason why we never came into conclusion, shes got her own world... i don't know...

@trip
Another witness to your mentality trip.. that makes us two.. hahaha! Nothing special... /sigh

[NASYO]

it's a passage from zen Buddhism.

[Thugstaz Hustlaz]

So what do you think are these "clear standards" for anything to be called a fact?

I already explained why depending on random luck to produce zillions of useful genetic changes is utterly unsupported by evidence (about randomness). In purely physical situations, which Darwinists claim life is, the luck is of randomness is nothing like the luck depended upon for organ-building random mutation. So why is that principle accepted blindly? As the very foundation of the theory, it should be the first thing confirmed!


Thanks


mode off..

[YLINGAO]

“The genome reveals, indisputably and beyond any serious doubt, that Darwin was right — mankind evolved over a long period of time from primitive ancestors. Our genes show that scientific creationism cannot be true. The response to all those who thump their bible [sic] and say there is no proof, no test and no evidence in support of evolution is, ‘The proof is right here, in our genes.” Source: Arthur Caplan, a professor of bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania, “Darwin vindicated!”

Notes about Caplan. Caplan is the recipient of many awards and honors including the McGovern Medal of the American Medical Writers Association and the Franklin Award from the City of Philadelphia. He was a person of the Year 2001 from USA Today, one of the fifty most influential people in American health care by Modern Health Care magazine, one of the ten most influential people in America in biotechnology by the National Journal and one of the ten most influential people in the ethics of biotechnology by the editors of Nature Biotechnology.He holds seven honorary degrees from colleges and medical schools. Discover magazine in December, 2008 named him one of the ten most influential people in science.

Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true. If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things. ~ Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D., is the director of the Human Genome Project.

Other notes about Collins: Francis Collins was recently appointed by President Obama as the 16th Director of the National Institutes of Health. Collins' accomplishments have been recognized by numerous awards and honors, including election to the Institute of Medicine and the National Academy of Sciences. He also received the Presidential Medal of Freedom and was a Kilby International Awards recipient in 1993.

Science has already declared it [evolution] to be a fact beyond any reasonable doubt

Bang! *patay mga creationists* Ang kamatooran dina gyud mabangbang! Unya ingnon dayon nila mga bakakon ang scientists hahahahahaha kay wa nay ikasukol nga tubag. pgkatotyo nalang sa mga rason nila.

[Sinyalan]

^^ the only excuse with these creationists are mudslinging and personal attacks. They are good at these things because they can't support their claims, they can't provide scientific evidences, observable data plus they refuse to study. They have brains but they don't use it. They have eyes but they don't see it. They have other senses but they chose to be dumb, I mean numb. What more can you ask from these people except biblical faith.

Creationists are 101 percent good at "circular reasoning" - to borrow these words from one of the members.

[bluedes]

gosh, my studies led me back to where I was..
but I learned a lot of new things..

Darwin's theory of evolution, as most people here are debating about, is actually OUTDATED.

It's been superseded by the modern evolutionary synthesis (1936-1947), and that is what scientists are claiming as fact. IT IS A FACT OF LIFE.. its not a theory anymore, notice that there is not even the word theory..

so I guess creationists can just go home now, the party's over guys.. wa na jud moy malalisan.. hehe..


you can read the book Evolution: The Modern Synthesis, by Julian Huxley for a really comprehensive report about this.

[YLINGAO]

gosh, my studies led me back to where I was..
but I learned a lot of new things..

Darwin's theory of evolution, as most people here are debating about, is actually OUTDATED.

It's been superseded by the modern evolutionary synthesis (1936-1947), and that is what scientists are claiming as fact. IT IS A FACT OF LIFE.. its not a theory anymore, notice that there is not even the word theory..

so I guess creationists can just go home now, the party's over guys.. wa na jud moy malalisan.. hehe..

Hehehe...ayaw lang sab papau-lia blue. Magto-on una sila. for the sake of faith naman lang na intawn ilahang pakiglalis.

[Sinyalan]

^ mao gyud, even the Pope ni accept na nga ang evolution is a fact. Unsa pa kaha ilang ikalalis nila no?

I hope you guys learn a valuable lesson here...

[Thugstaz Hustlaz]

All those papers support micro-evolution, but that's not the evolution that according to dwarinism allows one species to transform through it's offsprings over time to another species. That's the part of evolution that hasn't been proven since for one no evolutionist has observed the changing from one species to another like what is portrayed in the evolution tree of life. We observe bacteria becoming immune to drugs everday, but why haven't we observed apes evolving into humans coninuously?