Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[Thugstaz Hustlaz]

---

watchu talkin bawt dawg...

i suggest you read "The Greatest Show on Earth" by Richard Dawkins and come back so you'd start making sense.

Thanks.. you are feel free to expose "The worst show on earth"..

[chad_tukes]

Thanks.. you are feel free to expose "The worst show on earth"..

you are delusional.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

OT @MALIC : I may add a borrowed saying also ....

"Philosophy is to be studied, not for the sake of any definite answers to its questions, since no definite answers can, as a rule, be known to be true, but rather for the sake of the questions themselves; because these questions enlarge our conception of what is possible, enrich our intellectual imagination and diminish the dogmatic assurance which closes the mind against speculation; but above all because, through the greatness of the universe which philosophy contemplates, the mind also is rendered great, and becomes capable of that union with the universe which constitutes its highest good."

- Betrand Russel

[chad_tukes]

intermission ta kadyot... JOKE - JOKE - JOKE sa ta beh... this thread is getting way too serious.

a believer of Evolution is asking questions to a Christian who believes in Creationism:

Q: Doesn't genetic variation indicate that life has been going on a long time?
A: Let's be up front about this. That's deviation, not variation, and yes, there is a lot of deviancy out there. That just shows that there has been a lot of Sin since the garden of Eden.

Q: What about Neanderthal Man?
A: Hey, you take one of those geezers and put him in tweeds and give him a pipe and he could be a professor anywhere.

[bluedes]

heard of mutation?

can u please explain what is *new* code sequences?

when you say *new*, is the sequence composed of differently new values? or is it a limited finite space?

1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1, 2

a new sequence will be:

2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 1, 3

that's the *new* sequence? We are still dealing with 4 elements.. so there is nothing *new* about it.. only the sequence is different.

when you *acquire* traits, you're supposed to *inherit* the trait because you don't have it..

but with this light in genetics, you don't acquire the trait anymore.. you already have it in you. you just need to get the "correct" sequence so that you will show that trait.. otherwise, the trait is hidden (or unexpressed).

that is what i'm trying to point out.. there's nothing *new*..

[kebotDiNaMute]

"To a cup that is already full, nothing can be added"

DO you mean NOTHING CAN BE FILLED? hmmm

[kebotDiNaMute]

I for one can not disprove that his Noodlyness, The Flying Spaghetti Monster, is the one overlooking the evolutionary process

hahaha, i dont think you guys have proven anything... nothing special.

[kebotDiNaMute]

correct, acquisition means getting new code sequences.

But where did you get the definition nga ang "acquisition", as used in evolution, means the increase in 4 bases?
mao na akong nakalibgan.

correct, acquisition means getting new code sequences.
--- aw, do you guys know this? are you thinking or another assumption? hmmm... dba ingon ni science everything starts from energy? well thermodynamics said energy changes form, but never looses nor gains... how in the world will you guys contest to what is already an established science against your story? hmmm... I dont buy this hahaha.. chory!

[kebotDiNaMute]

“The genome reveals, indisputably and beyond any serious doubt, that Darwin was right — mankind evolved over a long period of time from primitive ancestors. Our genes show that scientific creationism cannot be true. The response to all those who thump their bible [sic] and say there is no proof, no test and no evidence in support of evolution is, ‘The proof is right here, in our genes.” Source: Arthur Caplan, a professor of bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania, “Darwin vindicated!”

Notes about Caplan. Caplan is the recipient of many awards and honors including the McGovern Medal of the American Medical Writers Association and the Franklin Award from the City of Philadelphia. He was a person of the Year 2001 from USA Today, one of the fifty most influential people in American health care by Modern Health Care magazine, one of the ten most influential people in America in biotechnology by the National Journal and one of the ten most influential people in the ethics of biotechnology by the editors of Nature Biotechnology.He holds seven honorary degrees from colleges and medical schools. Discover magazine in December, 2008 named him one of the ten most influential people in science.

Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true. If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things. ~ Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D., is the director of the Human Genome Project.

Other notes about Collins: Francis Collins was recently appointed by President Obama as the 16th Director of the National Institutes of Health. Collins' accomplishments have been recognized by numerous awards and honors, including election to the Institute of Medicine and the National Academy of Sciences. He also received the Presidential Medal of Freedom and was a Kilby International Awards recipient in 1993.

Science has already declared it [evolution] to be a fact beyond any reasonable doubt

The genome reveals, indisputably and beyond any serious doubt, that Darwin was right — mankind evolved over a long period of time from primitive ancestors. Our genes show that scientific creationism cannot be true.
--- well the evidence show start from what you have seen... cell phone, computers, your food, everything brad... everything is created cell phone have purpose, your pc have purpose. Why do you have to be so technical when you can easily spot what is created and what is not.So you have to be so technical to prove your point? hmmm, that is why science becomes a religion because of the people who believe the lies. Kasayon raman ani na punto oi...--- bantug diay brad naka observe ta ice cap sa mars does it mean naay water dd2? too bad, your observation is wrong.Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true. If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things
--- do you know what is dna? DNA is some kind of a complex program. so whos the programmer? hehehe simple napod? dba? what you are doing is making up your own stories... hahay. logic tells me if there is a program / system somebody created it designed for a purpose.

[tripwire]

hahaha, i dont think you guys have proven anything... nothing special.

Like you have proof of....?

correct, acquisition means getting new code sequences.
--- aw, do you guys know this? are you thinking or another assumption? hmmm... dba ingon ni science everything starts from energy? well thermodynamics said energy changes form, but never looses nor gains... how in the world will you guys contest to what is already an established science against your story? hmmm... I dont buy this hahaha.. chory!

would you please put some logic in to this statement? I can't "pick" your brain if you have circular reasoning.