una mang question2x sa SRP... unaha ug asikaso ang hunasan
atleast ang SRP kai income generating na
Results 1,161 to 1,170 of 2400
-
10-04-2009, 08:31 PM #1161Banned User
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 3,061
-
10-05-2009, 12:34 AM #1162C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Gender
- Posts
- 5,218
Will Capitol’s suit ward off SRP investors? No, says VM
Will Capitol?s suit ward off SRP investors? No, says VM | Sun.Star Network Online
"Other than violating the anti-graft act, Cebu City officials and Filinvest Land violated the Commonwealth Act in their joint venture agreement to develop part of the South Road Properties (SRP), Cebu Gov. Gwendolyn Garcia has said."
-0-0-0-
Look who's talking! Unya ang Capitol di'ay WALA? Ang Friar Lands di'ay? Gigamitan lang ug legal technicalities.
Lahi lang ang style sa pag mane-obra, pero pareho ra'ng istoryaha. Mura man sad sila ug wala mag negosyo ug real estate with government lands.
Mao na, hilasan kaayo ko. Palimpyo effect pero hangol sad di'ay to. Ang nakalahi lang sa City Hall ug Capitol, BATI ang outcome sa Capitol and obvious kaayo ang diskarte.
Check Capitol?s motive for filing case over Filinvest deal: Labella | Sun.Star Network Online
"Labella, a former ombudsman Visayas director, said the office should also look into the motive of the governor in filing the complaint.
He said it is important to note that despite the publicity on both the FLI deal and the Balili lot purchase, the ombudsman took cognizance of the Capitol deal and not the joint venture agreement.
The ombudsman may investigate even without a complainant, if it sees that the acts of public offices “appear to be irregular, inefficient and immoral.”
-0-0-0-
PATAY!
Malilong: Full-blown war between Capitol, City | Sun.Star Network Online
"What is unique about a complaint under the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act is that the complainant doesn’t have to prove that the government official personally profited from the transaction that is claimed to be disadvantageous to the government. All that the law requires is that the contract is “grossly and manifestly disadvantageous,” regardless of whether the official profited or stood to profit by it."
-0-0-0-
With this being said by the lawyer-columnist, I really think that they should leave each other alone but Capitol was a "WELCHER" on the land swap deal where all this hullabaloo started in the first place and the SRP is too juicy for them (Garcias) not to have a part of it.Last edited by LytSlpr; 10-05-2009 at 12:48 AM.
-
10-05-2009, 01:32 AM #1163Banned User
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 3,061
atleast ang city kai willing mo defend sa project nga income generating, ang case kai disadvantageous ang deal part sa city.
ang balili property ug kepko deal?? wala nila gi huna2x kung advantageous ba na nga deal?
wala nila huna huna kung cge labay ug pila ka metric tons of coal ash waste diha... basin mahimo na ug bungtod.
awa ang balili property.. cge na sila ug blame kinsa sad an.. naka gasto pa jud ang capitol ug 98m
ngano dili man mangusog ang gov nga collectahon ang full amount??
or casohan ang mga balili kai gi baligya an ang capitol ug hunasan?
ipa about sa court aron ma collecta balik ang full amount?
diba nga abugado mani sila?? ngita sila ug legal way nga ma collecta balik ang full amount
-
10-05-2009, 06:29 AM #1164Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 514
don't waste your hopes on our OMBUDSMAN. they are lame ducks when it comes to high profile cases. pero kung ordinaryo kawani sa gobyerno nga nangawat lang ug 2K tua epiktibo kaayu mo investigate and penalize
-
10-05-2009, 07:57 AM #1165C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 25,143
^^mao sd jd. bias kaayu...
-
10-05-2009, 08:11 AM #1166Elite Member
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 1,357
^^
Tigasin pud ning Syudad da......... wa nahadlok sa Capitol.
-
10-06-2009, 05:57 AM #1167Banned User
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 3,061
source: ?No COA approval? | Sun.Star Network Online
dili sugot ang capitol ani kai dili ma haras para mo back out sa deal"The agreement also gave FLI not only immunity from suits but the right to suspend payments and all development activities in the event of a suit."
gi protectahan sa cebu city ang investors.. basin nakita nani sa cebu city gov nga sooner or later mo abot jud ani nga point
cge panaway pero gusto pud diay to maka hikap sa SRPThe Capitol applied to qualify to bid but was disqualified by the City’s Joint Venture Selection Committee because it is not a private entity and it failed to prove that it has the financial capability and technical expertise to undertake the project. No other developer challenged FLI’s bid.
-
10-06-2009, 05:58 AM #1168Banned User
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 3,061
source: ?No COA approval? | Sun.Star Network Online
dili sugot ang capitol ani kai dili ma haras para mo back out sa deal"The agreement also gave FLI not only immunity from suits but the right to suspend payments and all development activities in the event of a suit."
gi protectahan sa cebu city ang investors.. basin nakita nani sa cebu city gov nga sooner or later mo abot jud ani nga point
cge panaway pero gusto pud diay to maka hikap sa SRPThe Capitol applied to qualify to bid but was disqualified by the City’s Joint Venture Selection Committee because it is not a private entity and it failed to prove that it has the financial capability and technical expertise to undertake the project. No other developer challenged FLI’s bid.
-
10-06-2009, 08:12 AM #1169C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Gender
- Posts
- 5,218
unya kay wa man sila kasakay, nag sourgraping dayon.
Originally Posted by gikapoy
see! they are questioning the SRP, unya gusto man di'ay sila mo apil.
-
10-06-2009, 08:27 AM #1170Banned User
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 3,061
gusto sila mo apil sa multiplier effect sa SRP Originally Posted by LytSlpr
Reply With Quote Advertisement
Similar Threads |
|
|