Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[botslob]

---

Do you know why scientists believe that evolution is a fact because:
Sufficient evidence exists in support of evolution to convince 99.85% of America's earth and life scientists that the theory is valid. Evolution is the key unifying theory that unifies many different branches of science, from cosmology to biology.


According to Newsweek:

"By one count there are some 700 scientists with respectable academic credentials (out of a total of 480,000 U.S. earth and life scientists) who give credence to creation-science..."

That would make the support for creation science among those branches of science who deal with the earth and its life forms to be about 0.14%
Source: Why most scientists support the theory of evolution

Unsay pasabot ani? Creationist science will be extinct!

[botslob]

"mismo mga creationists gidaut si hovind kay bakakon daw. kinsa man gyud diay tinood nga mga creationist noh? hmmmm"
--- diin man ka ani namugas? or just your pagarpar to make noise.. hmmm i wonder... ni kalit lang.. hahaha!

Di man ko mamakak pareho's ninyo . Kent Hovind - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
From creationists

Hovind has been criticized by other creationists, including young earth creationists and old earth creationists who believe that many of his arguments are invalid and, consequently, undermine their cause. Disagreements over how to respond to Hovind's claims have themselves contributed to acrimony between creationist organizations. The Australian and U.S. arms of Answers in Genesis (AiG) were critical of Hovind[63] after he had criticized[64] an AiG position document "Arguments we think creationists should NOT use".[65] In particular AiG criticized Hovind for "persistently us[ing] discredited or false arguments".[55]
The U.S. arm of AiG, led by Ken Ham had an acrimonious split with its Australian parent in 2005. The Australian organization then split itself entirely off, now styling themselves as Creation Ministries International. Material critical of Hovind was no longer available on the U.S. Answers In Genesis website, whereas the Australian CMI website still chose to retain the critical material.[66] The CMI article written by Carl Wieland and Jonathan Sarfati stated that the claims made by Hovind are "fraudulent" and contain "mistakes in facts and logic which do the creationist cause no good."[63][67] CMI also criticized Hovind for using "fraudulent claims" made by Ron Wyatt in his claims.[63]
Creationist astronomer Hugh Ross, of Reasons to Believe, debated Hovind on the age of the Earth during the John Ankerberg Show, televised nationally on the Inspiration Network in September through October 2000.[68][69] Ross said Hovind was "misrepresenting the field" of different sciences,[70] and Ross told Hovind: "Astronomers view the credibility of the 'Young Earth' as being much weaker than that for a flat earth."[71] Hovind and Ross previously debated in July 1999 on the Steve Brown Show.[72]
Hovind has stated that carbon dating — a method used by scientists to estimate the age of various objects and events — is unreliable.[73] He has been criticized by Greg Neyman of Answers in Creation (an old Earth creationist group), who says that in Hovind's statements "Hovind goes on to show that he knows absolutely nothing about the science of Carbon Dating."[74] Neyman says that Hovind's claim that "scientists assume the amount of carbon-14 is constant" is wrong, and Neyman writes "there are many periods of decreasing C-14, which disproves his theory that the earth is young based on C-14 equilibrium."[74]

[botslob]

From fellow creationists:

The CMI article written by Carl Wieland and Jonathan Sarfati stated that the claims made by Hovind are "fraudulent" and contain "mistakes in facts and logic which do the creationist cause no good."

Grabiha diay aning Hovind no kay fraudulent man diay ni iyahang mga claims hihihihi

[botslob]

Science says that evolution is a fact:

- Evolution Resources from the National Academies
- Evolution as theory and fact - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[botslob]

Evolution is a fact in the sense of it being overwhelmingly validated by the evidence. Frequently evolution is said to be a fact in the same way as the Earth revolving around the Sun is a fact.[15][16] The following quotation from H. J. Muller, "One Hundred Years Without Darwin Are Enough" explains the point.

[regnauld]

EVOLUTION is a FACT and as a Psyc teacher, I teach SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY and under which EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY is a part of our study!

[botslob]

EVOLUTION is a FACT and as a Psyc teacher, I teach SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY and under which EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY is a part of our study!

wow! lahi ra gyud ni ang nakasabot sa evolution sir no?

[kebotDiNaMute]

Science says that evolution is a fact:

- Evolution Resources from the National Academies
- Evolution as theory and fact - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dont fool us using wiki brad, its just an article... what about this... don't be nub
The Lie: Evolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[kebotDiNaMute]

Evolution is a fact in the sense of it being overwhelmingly validated by the evidence. Frequently evolution is said to be a fact in the same way as the Earth revolving around the Sun is a fact.[15][16] The following quotation from H. J. Muller, "One Hundred Years Without Darwin Are Enough" explains the point.

Frequently evolution is said to be a fact in the same way as the Earth revolving around the Sun is a fact.
--- naa kay source ani brad o imo imo rani?You want trial, lets try it... gud luck.

[regnauld]

wow! lahi ra gyud ni ang nakasabot sa evolution sir no?

Yes you are right. We just don't argue with those people who don't know the concept of evolution much more for those who don't have the credentials and the credibility in the first place!