
Originally Posted by
tripwire
Kebz, are you back to square one about evolution again? you keep on arguing the same stuff over over and over again. Doesn't make you dizzy?
Seriously dodong kebz, I am confused the way you constructed this sentence. But somehow I understand what it means... first, apes are not descendants of men... they are distant cousins that came from one source. Imagine a tree, with that tree, there are branches and those "branches" are figuratively speaking are different types of species. Apes are one of those "branches" not as what you think that men came from Apes. Because that is totally a wrong conclusion. However, creationists arguably strong with this ideas because they can't pin point the reason why there are still apes in this planet while the fact is that... they are actually your cousins... my cousins.. everyone's cousins. Now, if you don't like my arguments... please read! As I have told you numerous times.
"they are distant cousins that came from one source"
--- well, in that case have you found your missing link... unless u present yourself.. hmmm.
"and those "branches" are figuratively speaking are different types of species"
--- hmmm, i don't agree. I cannot figure this out. isn't a specie a different form independent to another? If you cut the tree, the branches will die too? so how come you said this? what were you thinking?
"they are actually your cousins... my cousins.. everyone's cousins"
--- hahaha, go ahead, greet your cousins.. hahaha! Trip my answer to that is a common designer have common style...
please read!
--- please evolve watch documentaries... its easy, comfortable and of course hip. hahaha!
"you keep on arguing the same stuff"
--- well you havent provided yet a convincing proof. So long as you are implying your idea to me... well same story. A THEORY IS A THEORY, not FACT...