Compatibility of Science and Religion

[Ramini]

---

Science cannot just be created.
1. what about pseudo-science. Well at the height of thier claims people called it science... It simply just created.
2. Science is a branch of knowledge, creation/invention ties up with it. so what happen to created?

you are talking about discoveries... what about the rest? Well, Religion is not discovered its about morality. Is there discoveries in religion? POINT is, comparing apple and bananas at the advantage of one makes the other one less interesting. Well you can mix the two to make a salad.

Weeeeeee!!! kebot's hereee!!!

[forester]

Science cannot just be created.
1. what about pseudo-science. Well at the height of thier claims people called it science... It simply just created.
2. Science is a branch of knowledge, creation/invention ties up with it. so what happen to created?

you are talking about discoveries... what about the rest? Well, Religion is not discovered its about morality. Is there discoveries in religion? POINT is, comparing apple and bananas at the advantage of one makes the other one less interesting. Well you can mix the two to make a salad.

I was expecting a more intelligent structure of comparison and soundness of thoughts.

first thesis:
Pseudo-sciences dodong was only considered as science by some people not really educated in science [perhaps like you].

second thesis:
Your statement "science is a branch of knowledge" is totally WRONG. It is not a branch of knowledge, it is a BODY OF KNOWLEDGE. I mean, everything science owns were already a property of the space and universe ab initio. Do not make your own linguistic supposition such as "creation" because it has never been my argument. Ayaw gud pabryt-bryt dong gud.

third thesis:
Science had only been experienced by man through discoveries. Kung wala pa kana, pulos lang unta ka-ignorante ang sulod sa tawhanong panghuna-huna; pulos lang patuo-tuo nga maoy gi-indosar anang relihiyon. Klaro nga kining dapita wala nimo mahibaw-i. Ayaw paghisgut about "morality" dong kay nagpasabut lang nga wa kay nasayran mahitungod niini. The standard of morality among men during the time human being was still using stone as his prime tools IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT from morality we now knew in this electronic time. Using flash lights in the ancient era may cause your death for heresy and sorcery.

fourth thesis:
We cannot produce a salad just by simply consolidating religion [belief] and science [knowledge], your assumption is defective due to a fallacious similitude. I hope your intelligence can comprehend this simple presentation. Good luck!

[flying fish]

Religion can immediately be created by any sound or unsound human mind; Science cannot just be created, it is discovered.

Amen bro,,, il just hope that someday science will discover religion & religion will have faith on science.

[regnauld]

Amen bro,,, il just hope that someday science will discover religion & religion will have faith on science.

There is now a science on religion which is based on the philosophy of SPIRITUAL SCIENCE by Rudolf Steiner!

[Ramini]

sorry double post...

[Ramini]

*getting excited* hehe!! let's see how this fares

[chad_tukes]

Religion can immediately be created by any sound or unsound human mind; Science cannot just be created, it is discovered.

reminds me of what Richard Dawkins said:

"when one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion."

[brownprose]

I was expecting a more intelligent structure of comparison and soundness of thoughts.

first thesis:
Pseudo-sciences dodong was only considered as science by some people not really educated in science [perhaps like you].

second thesis:
Your statement "science is a branch of knowledge" is totally WRONG. It is not a branch of knowledge, it is a BODY OF KNOWLEDGE. I mean, everything science owns were already a property of the space and universe ab initio. Do not make your own linguistic supposition such as "creation" because it has never been my argument. Ayaw gud pabryt-bryt dong gud.

third thesis:
Science had only been experienced by man through discoveries. Kung wala pa kana, pulos lang unta ka-ignorante ang sulod sa tawhanong panghuna-huna; pulos lang patuo-tuo nga maoy gi-indosar anang relihiyon. Klaro nga kining dapita wala nimo mahibaw-i. Ayaw paghisgut about "morality" dong kay nagpasabut lang nga wa kay nasayran mahitungod niini. The standard of morality among men during the time human being was still using stone as his prime tools IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT from morality we now knew in this electronic time. Using flash lights in the ancient era may cause your death for heresy and sorcery.

fourth thesis:
We cannot produce a salad just by simply consolidating religion [belief] and science [knowledge], your assumption is defective due to a fallacious similitude. I hope your intelligence can comrehend this simple presentation. Good luck!

excellent kaayo mr. forester ... lawm og ha-it gyud ning mga tinun-ang dominico

[Ramini]

reminds me of what Richard Dawkins said:

"when one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion."

oi another one for the baul..thanks sir chad!..hehehe!!!

[YLINGAO]

I was expecting a more intelligent structure of comparison and soundness of thoughts.

first thesis:
Pseudo-sciences dodong was only considered as science by some people not really educated in science [perhaps like you].

second thesis:
Your statement "science is a branch of knowledge" is totally WRONG. It is not a branch of knowledge, it is a BODY OF KNOWLEDGE. I mean, everything science owns were already a property of the space and universe ab initio. Do not make your own linguistic supposition such as "creation" because it has never been my argument. Ayaw gud pabryt-bryt dong gud.

third thesis:
Science had only been experienced by man through discoveries. Kung wala pa kana, pulos lang unta ka-ignorante ang sulod sa tawhanong panghuna-huna; pulos lang patuo-tuo nga maoy gi-indosar anang relihiyon. Klaro nga kining dapita wala nimo mahibaw-i. Ayaw paghisgut about "morality" dong kay nagpasabut lang nga wa kay nasayran mahitungod niini. The standard of morality among men during the time human being was still using stone as his prime tools IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT from morality we now knew in this electronic time. Using flash lights in the ancient era may cause your death for heresy and sorcery.

fourth thesis:
We cannot produce a salad just by simply consolidating religion [belief] and science [knowledge], your assumption is defective due to a fallacious similitude. I hope your intelligence can comrehend this simple presentation. Good luck!

maau unta makasabot si kebot ani no?