
Originally Posted by
brownprose
We probably vary in our definitions on spirituality. My definition is more of psycho-social and anthropological while yours is maybe "theological" (if I'm not mistaken) which prompted you to think that religion "is not" a/the product of spirituality.
Just to clarify, spirituality (from the point of anthropology) was already observed by early humans (Neanderthals) in a form of reverence for or worship of sacred objects, offering and burial ceremonies etc... long before the first religion was built. In essence, humans are particularly "spiritual" or "seeking" in nature according to cognitive science.
And when humans came to learn how to write, came also the various authors in different regions all attempting to write their spiritual traditions, their myths and legends, their codes of conduct all poured into their writings forming adherents and believers taking them as "absolute truths" or divinely inspired or sacred. Thus, the birth of many religions.
So why are there many religious militants today? Religious militancy is not something new. In the past, people even fought to prove who the better god was. As I have said in another thread, there were more than 2,000 recorded events related to religious war and violence as religions matured sometime in 1000 CE. Even today, because religions vary in their concept and exercise of spirituality, it has also become a cause of friction. Thus your observation is correct when you said of the militants as the "effects of religion."