Cyber Bullying- watch out guys!

[raski]

---

Wait for the decision of the Stevens case aron ma confirm ang imong equation. Bwahaha....

Whatever the result of the Stevens case will be, it will not change the meanings of bullying and libel. They are different things. Go look the words up in Merriam-Webster.

Also, the Stevens Case pertains to an attack on a model, famous as she may be, not a politician. There are thousands upon thousands of posts about politicians, a lot of them very insulting and a lot of them alleging corruption, *** scandals, etc in the States. None of them result in even a comment from their politicians because they know already that it is a losing battle to do so.

By even paying attention to the numerous thousands of posts every day directed against a politician, they bolster their legitimacy, which has the contrary effect of what they intended. It's like the katrina halili scandal, if she had not brought it up and if it had not been made a huge deal of, then hardly anyone will have seen the videos at all. Fact of the matter is, you direct your attention at a perceived insult and all of a sudden, everyone is in on it when otherwise it would have simply been forgotten as just another comment on the internet...

[godwhacker]

Whatever, models, politicians or public figures, when the local courts give a decision unfavorable or detrimental to the (in your view) freedom of the internet, will send a message to all that internet as free as it is will be no longer be the same what we used to think of it. The danger is it will be a precedent. Di man siguro maut nga atong alertohon atong mga kaubanan dire sa internet nga naa na diay ingon ini karon. Di ta kahibawo sa motibo sa tawo nganong modangup sa balaud. But for sure it is a tarnished reputation.

[Vietcong696]

both raski and godwhacker has a point..but bullying is not automatically = libel..it should be analyzed first before considering it as libel..

[LytSlpr]

ako ra gyud ikasulti ani, unsa man gani ang outcome sa Steven's case nga gi-mention ni godwhacker, huwat lang ta sa resulta.

if iyang agawon, buot gyud mo-kiha, ipa-kiha na lang tanan tawo diri sa Istorya.Net nga ni-question ug ni-insinuate nga si Gwen Gacia kurakot ug iyang mga project puro pangwarta. I-apil na lang sad to ang gitawag sila ug unggoy ug bati'g nawong. Unsa man ang naka-libel ana? Nga tinuod man sad. (nga bati ug nawong).

makiha di'ay ko kung mo-ingon ko nga di ko motuo nga nahapak tanan kwarta sa CICC? kung mao man gani, sobra pa di'ay ni kay Makoy si Tita Gwen.

[godwhacker]

^^^ Mao dyud bro. This is a test case and the first to be decided in our country. We can say whatever we like in the internet bisan makadaut pa sa reputasyon sa uban. Di lang na sila mag gunok, way problema, wa dyud nang libel. Unya bisan pa pud ug ma keha man gani naa pay huwes nga mo desisyon kung duna ba dyuy libel o wala. So di na angayan nga ikahadlok. Kining Stevens case karon ug modaug diay sya di, business as usual.

[ronz_rodz]

if sa istorya lang... daghan ng nasakpan.. pwerteng daghanang bugal bugal dire sa atong forums